The idea was that it's nicer to keep that config in .spec where it's subject
to syntax highlighting. split-files.py was supposed to a stand-alone program.
But in practice this split is confusing, because file rules are listed in two
places and we need to modify split-files.py quite often. This will be easier if
everything is in one file.
[skip changelog]
The LICENSE.LGPL2.1 file is installed into the same systemd license
directory for both the base systemd and -libs. Because the base
systemd requires the -libs sub package it's a duplicate and will
always be there, it shouldn't cause an issue but it seems in some
cases the duplication into the same directory causes issues with
ostree so remove it from the base systemd package as it will always
be there due to the hard dep on the -libs subpackage.
... (rhbz#2240828)
We currently have grubby-8.40-72.fc39 and sdubby-1.0-3.fc39.
systemd had 'Conflicts: grubby < 8.40-72', which is satisfied by grubby.
But sdubby has 'Provides: grubby' (with no version), which prevented
installation:
$ sudo rpm -i ./sdubby-1.0-3.fc39.noarch.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
grubby < 8.40-72 conflicts with (installed) systemd-udev-254.2-7.fc39.x86_64
The rpm docs don't actually say what the meaning of the 'if' is:
is it only satisfied by actual package names, or also by Provides. But
experiments suggest that Provides are not used. The rich dependency seems
to avoid the issue.
This reverts commit 8eea43e714.
Fedora already ships 'disable systemd-boot-update.service' in
/usr/lib/systemd/system-preset/90-default.preset, so we don't need
this.
[skip changelog]
The macro expansions would only work when compiled with a recent version of
systemd. We don't want to create a dependency loop like this, let's just expand
the string manually.
Also backport the patch adding %systemd_postun_with_reload and
%systemd_user_postun_with_reload so a FPC documentation change can be filed.
Let's make sure we clean up after ourselves. We have to remove
the generated timeout user config file, the file list files and the
generated .lang file.
... (rhbz#2217997)
systemd-homed.service and systemd-portabled.service are in
systemd-udev but the scriptlet was attached to main subpackage, so it
wouldn't work because the unit file wasn't installed yet when it was
invoked. systemd-pstore.service and remote-cryptsetup.target were
forgotten, so they wouldn't get enabled on installation.
Rpm >= 4.19 has native sysusers integration and generates similar
user() and group() provides but encodes additional information into
them, information that is required for the rpm integration to work.
Besides additional data, one noteworthy difference in the rpm generated
provides is there are no provides generated for m(ember) directives.
This is because users and groups possibly created by that directive are
a too implicit for dependency resolution and install ordering purposes
in the case where the user/group is actually owned by some other package.
