rpms/samba
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

auto-import samba-2.2.1a-5 from samba-2.2.1a-5.src.rpm

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
cvsdist 2004-09-09 12:03:37 +00:00
parent 9cd4791428
commit 708690231b
1 changed files with 11 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
samba.spec
View File

@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
Summary: The Samba SMB server. Summary: The Samba SMB server.
Name: samba Name: samba
Version: 2.2.1a Version: 2.2.1a
Release: 4 Release: 5
License: GNU GPL Version 2 License: GNU GPL Version 2
Group: System Environment/Daemons Group: System Environment/Daemons
URL: http://www.samba.org/ URL: http://www.samba.org/
@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ Patch100: samba-j.patch.bz2
Patch111: samba-2.2.0-ook.patch Patch111: samba-2.2.0-ook.patch
Patch200: samba-j-2.patch.bz2 Patch200: samba-j-2.patch.bz2
# s390 patches
Patch300: samba-2.2.1a-s390.patch
Requires: pam >= 0.64 %{auth} samba-common = %{version} Requires: pam >= 0.64 %{auth} samba-common = %{version}
Requires: logrotate >= 3.4 initscripts >= 5.54-1 Requires: logrotate >= 3.4 initscripts >= 5.54-1
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root
@ -108,6 +111,10 @@ cp %{SOURCE7} packaging/RedHat/
%patch111 -p1 -b .ook %patch111 -p1 -b .ook
### %patch200 -p1 -b .j-2 ### %patch200 -p1 -b .j-2
%ifarch s390 s390x
%patch300 -p1 -b .s390
%endif
%build %build
cd source cd source
@ -320,6 +327,9 @@ fi
#%{_mandir}/ja/man8/smbpasswd.8* #%{_mandir}/ja/man8/smbpasswd.8*
%changelog %changelog
* Tue Nov 6 2001 Than Ngo <than@redhat.com> 2.2.1a-5
- workaround for non-broadcast interface on s390 (bug #55421)
* Mon Aug 13 2001 Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg@redhat.com> * Mon Aug 13 2001 Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg@redhat.com>
- Don't include smbpasswd in samba, it's in samba-common (#51598) - Don't include smbpasswd in samba, it's in samba-common (#51598)
- Add a disabled "obey pam restrictions" statement - it's not - Add a disabled "obey pam restrictions" statement - it's not