rpm/rpm-4.11.x-cursor-failchk.patch

57 lines
2.0 KiB
Diff

commit 452553111b9929074bcbb77a49c041582daae0e8
Author: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>
Date: Tue Feb 5 10:11:19 2013 +0200
Check for stale db locks when opening write-cursors
- During long-running transactions its entirely possible for some
other player to come and go leaving stale locks behind and cause
the transaction to get stuck until the cavalry comes along in the
form of somebody else opening the rpmdb, clearing the blockage.
- Presumably dbenv->failchk() is not entirely free of cost so we only
do this for writes which are way more critical and also more prone to
getting stuck.
- dbenv->failchk() could return DB_RUNRECOVER in which case we should
abort everything but we lack a mechanism to do it... just add
a reminder comment for now.
diff --git a/lib/backend/db3.c b/lib/backend/db3.c
index 656486b..de8071b 100644
--- a/lib/backend/db3.c
+++ b/lib/backend/db3.c
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ dbiCursor dbiCursorInit(dbiIndex dbi, unsigned int flags)
DB * db = dbi->dbi_db;
DBC * cursor;
int cflags;
- int rc;
+ int rc = 0;
uint32_t eflags = db_envflags(db);
/* DB_WRITECURSOR requires CDB and writable db */
@@ -259,8 +259,23 @@ dbiCursor dbiCursorInit(dbiIndex dbi, unsigned int flags)
} else
cflags = 0;
- rc = db->cursor(db, NULL, &cursor, cflags);
- rc = cvtdberr(dbi, "db->cursor", rc, _debug);
+ /*
+ * Check for stale locks which could block writes "forever".
+ * XXX: Should we also do this on reads? Reads are less likely
+ * to get blocked so it seems excessive...
+ * XXX: On DB_RUNRECOVER, we should abort everything. Now
+ * we'll just fail to open a cursor again and again and again.
+ */
+ if (cflags & DB_WRITECURSOR) {
+ DB_ENV *dbenv = db->get_env(db);
+ rc = dbenv->failchk(dbenv, 0);
+ rc = cvtdberr(dbi, "dbenv->failchk", rc, _debug);
+ }
+
+ if (rc == 0) {
+ rc = db->cursor(db, NULL, &cursor, cflags);
+ rc = cvtdberr(dbi, "db->cursor", rc, _debug);
+ }
if (rc == 0) {
dbc = xcalloc(1, sizeof(*dbc));