rpm/rpm-4.9.0-fstate-verify.patch
Panu Matilainen 5a40a02fce - verify some properties of replaced and wrong-colored files (#528383)
- only list packages that would be generated on spec query (#693338)
- preferred color packages should be erased last (#680261)
- fix leaks when freeing a populated transaction set
- take file state into account for file dependencies
2011-04-05 18:24:15 +03:00

42 lines
1.4 KiB
Diff

commit ee0ae58b442c5f79967a0d0580144b5c84e0c888
Author: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Mar 9 10:25:29 2011 +0200
Verify some properties of replaced and wrong-colored files (RhBug:528383)
- We can't verify any properties of replaced files, but we can and
should still see if it exists at all.
- Files skipped due to wrong color are supposed to share some of
the attributes with the file that got actually installed, such
as permissions and whether it exists at all. Verify what we can
instead of silently ignoring.
diff --git a/lib/verify.c b/lib/verify.c
index 3be357d..46210bc 100644
--- a/lib/verify.c
+++ b/lib/verify.c
@@ -70,12 +70,22 @@ int rpmVerifyFile(const rpmts ts, const rpmfi fi,
*/
switch (rpmfiFState(fi)) {
case RPMFILE_STATE_NETSHARED:
- case RPMFILE_STATE_REPLACED:
case RPMFILE_STATE_NOTINSTALLED:
- case RPMFILE_STATE_WRONGCOLOR:
case RPMFILE_STATE_MISSING:
return 0;
break;
+ case RPMFILE_STATE_REPLACED:
+ /* For replaced files we can only verify if it exists at all */
+ flags = RPMVERIFY_LSTATFAIL;
+ break;
+ case RPMFILE_STATE_WRONGCOLOR:
+ /*
+ * Files with wrong color are supposed to share some attributes
+ * with the actually installed file - verify what we can.
+ */
+ flags &= ~(RPMVERIFY_FILEDIGEST | RPMVERIFY_FILESIZE |
+ RPMVERIFY_MTIME | RPMVERIFY_RDEV);
+ break;
case RPMFILE_STATE_NORMAL:
break;
}