Add "downstream only" explanations to various patches
Suggested by Neal Gompa in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774417
This commit is contained in:
parent
853a0fc587
commit
6b5182a34c
@ -246,6 +246,8 @@ Patch111: 00111-no-static-lib.patch
|
|||||||
# 00189 #
|
# 00189 #
|
||||||
# Instead of bundled wheels, use our RPM packaged wheels from
|
# Instead of bundled wheels, use our RPM packaged wheels from
|
||||||
# /usr/share/python-wheels
|
# /usr/share/python-wheels
|
||||||
|
# Downstream only: upstream bundles
|
||||||
|
# We might eventually pursuit upstream support, but it's low prio
|
||||||
Patch189: 00189-use-rpm-wheels.patch
|
Patch189: 00189-use-rpm-wheels.patch
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# 00251
|
# 00251
|
||||||
@ -253,6 +255,7 @@ Patch189: 00189-use-rpm-wheels.patch
|
|||||||
# to /usr/local if executable is /usr/bin/python* and RPM build
|
# to /usr/local if executable is /usr/bin/python* and RPM build
|
||||||
# is not detected to make pip and distutils install into separate location
|
# is not detected to make pip and distutils install into separate location
|
||||||
# Fedora Change: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Making_sudo_pip_safe
|
# Fedora Change: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Making_sudo_pip_safe
|
||||||
|
# Downstream only: Awaiting resources to work on upstream PEP
|
||||||
Patch251: 00251-change-user-install-location.patch
|
Patch251: 00251-change-user-install-location.patch
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# 00274 #
|
# 00274 #
|
||||||
@ -262,6 +265,8 @@ Patch274: 00274-fix-arch-names.patch
|
|||||||
# 00328 #
|
# 00328 #
|
||||||
# Restore pyc to TIMESTAMP invalidation mode as default in rpmbubild
|
# Restore pyc to TIMESTAMP invalidation mode as default in rpmbubild
|
||||||
# See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/57#comment-27426
|
# See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/57#comment-27426
|
||||||
|
# Downstream only: only used when building RPM packages
|
||||||
|
# Ideally, we should talk to upstream and explain why we don't want this
|
||||||
Patch328: 00328-pyc-timestamp-invalidation-mode.patch
|
Patch328: 00328-pyc-timestamp-invalidation-mode.patch
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# (New patches go here ^^^)
|
# (New patches go here ^^^)
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user