When reviewing https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros/pull-request/291
we have discovered that there is no macronized way to get this part of some paths
and that packagers need to hardcode it as cpython-%{python3_version_nodots}.
This way, we have a standardized macro packagers (and other macros) can use.
Our Pythons currently patches distutils to install packages to
/usr/lib(64)/pythonX.Y/site-packages when the $RPM_BUILD_ROOT environment
variable is set (and to /usr/local/lib(64)/pythonX.Y/site-packages otherwise).
With the deprecation of distutils [1] we want to change the patch to create
and use a different sysconfig install scheme [2].
However, we have realized that macros defined as %(%{__python3} ...) don't
"see" the environment variables set by rpmbuild because they are expanded earlier
and hence e.g. %{python3_sitelib} evaluates to
/usr/local/lib/python3.X/site-packages -- which is not desired.
To be able to reliably detect an RPM build environment by checking
the presence of the $RPM_BUILD_ROOT environment variable,
we manually set it in the macro definitions.
Since %{buildroot} in not fully populated
(e.g. it can expand literally to
/home/anna/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.x86_64),
we don't use it here.
The variable simply needs to present in the environment.
See also the analysis of the build failures when this is not done [3].
[1] https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0632/
[2] https://bugs.python.org/issue43976
[3] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.10/pull-request/63#comment-79042
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note about the backport: This is not required with the default %__python3 value,
but it is required when %__python3 is redefined to /usr/bin/python3.11 (or newer).
%%py{3}_check_import now respects the custom setting of %%py{3}_shebang_flags
and invokes Python with the respective values.
If %%py{3}_shebang_flags is undefined or set to no value,
there no flags are passed to Python on invoke.
Resolves: rhbz#2018615
-f: optionally read a file with module names to test
-t: bool flag - if set, filter only top-level modules
-e: optionally exclude module names matching the given glob (Unix
shell-style wildcards)
Importing all modules may cause bogus failures in some cases,
eg. when the imported code assumes there is an existing graphical window.
Such behaviour may be by design, hence for automatic processing it's
more convinient to - in some cases - check only for top-level modules
or filter out the troublemakers.
This allows us to maintain our own BuildRoot Policy scripts in an easier way.
This change needs to be coordinated with the removal of the files from redhat-rpm-config.
redhat-rpm-config requires python-srpm-macros, so no change is expected for the packagers.
With $PATH and $PYTHONPATH set to the %buildroot,
the macro tries to import the given Python 3 module(s).
Useful as a smoke test in %check when ruining tests is not feasible.
Accepts spaces or commas as separators.
Package python-six:
%check
%py3_check_import six
Executing(%check): ...
...
+ PATH=...
+ PYTHONPATH=...
+ PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1
+ /usr/bin/python3 -c 'import six'
+ RPM_EC=0
++ jobs -p
+ exit 0
%py3_check_import six seven
...
+ /usr/bin/python3 -c 'import six, seven'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'seven'
error: Bad exit status from ... (%check)
...
%py3_check_import five, six, seven
+ /usr/bin/python3 -c 'import five, six, seven'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'five'
error: Bad exit status from ... (%check)
Package python-packaging:
%py3_check_import packaging, packaging.markers packaging.requirements, packaging.tags
Executing(%check): ...
...
+ PATH=...
+ PYTHONPATH=...
+ PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1
+ /usr/bin/python3 -c 'import packaging, packaging.markers, packaging.requirements, packaging.tags'
+ RPM_EC=0
++ jobs -p
+ exit 0
%py3_check_import packaging, packaging.markers packaging.notachance, packaging.tags
...
+ /usr/bin/python3 -c 'import packaging, packaging.markers, packaging.notachance, packaging.tags'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'packaging.notachance'
error: Bad exit status from ... (%check)
The %{? in the comment made the entire block of macros not work.
Since nobody actually used those on Fedora, because they did not exist,
we can safely remove them. No need to document this in the %changelog.
The %{?load:%{SOURCE102}} construct no longer works in RPM 4.17+
Currently, we:
1. Load %{SOURCE102} if it exists.
This should always be the case when actually building the RPM or SRPM package.
2. Else, load macros.python-srpm if it exists.
This is the case when something parses the spec from dist-git without setting
%_sourcedir to the current working directory. E.g. rpmdev-bumpspec does this.
3. Else, don't load anything, get %{__default_python3_version} from the environment.
This is the case when something parses the spec in isolation.
Getting the version from sources is impossible, because the sources are missing.
So we get the installed version instead. Note that this will blow up on Fedora < 33,
but it already did before.
Distutils which were used to define the macros are deprecated in Python3.10:
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0632/.
Sysconfig isn't and it works across our Pythons, making it better choice for the task.
This allows e.g.:
%global extras cli,ghostwriter,pytz,dateutil,lark,numpy,pandas,pytest,redis,zoneinfo,django
%{pyproject_extras_subpkg -n python3-hypothesis %{extras}}
...
%pyproject_buildrequires -x %{extras}
(Note that %pyproject_extras_subpkg is a tiny wrapper around %python_extras_subpkg.)
Avoid using the full path and instead rely on PATH being correctly set
up to find the executable.
This fixes byte compilation for python2.7 when doing flatpak module
builds where python2.7 can be in either /usr/bin or /app/bin, depending
on how it's compiled.
Since Fedora 33, the package version always == %{__default_python3_version}.
When we update Python to 3.X+1, we update the version and the macro.
When the macro is not updated confusing things happen.
See for example https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931421#c4
We could assert the versions match in %check instead,
but this way a temporary pull request for a new Python version, such as
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-macros/pull-request/50https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-macros/pull-request/84
can be kept rebased via the git forge UI.
Note that the value of %{__default_python3_version} is loaded from sources in
dist git, otherwise it would be defined by the previous build of this package.
As a result, the spec file is no longer parsable on it's own, but IMHO that's OK.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Disable_Python_2_Dist_RPM_Generators_and_Freeze_Python_2_Macros
This is to be shipped together with an upgrade of python2.7:
The python2.7 RPM package will contain the removed macros instead.
The release is intentionally over-bumped to allow some changes of
python-rpm-macros in lower versions of Fedora without the need to bump
the version-release of python2-rpm-macros obsoleted by python2.7.
This only works for package and extra names less than 79 characters long.
I don't expect many actual packages to exceed this limit.
78 characters should be enough for everybody.
Why 78? 79 is the line-lenght limit from rpmlint.
And we need to put punctuation in there.
Versioned pathfixX.Y.py is available in main as well as in
alternative Pythons so this change enables to build
an alternative Python stack without a dependency on the main
python3-devel.
By default, %{py3_dist foo} generates python3dist(foo).
This change makes it respect %python3_pkgversion so when
it is redefined as X.Y, %{py3_dist foo} generates pythonX.Y(foo).
Charalampos Stratakis
Miro Hrončok
Karolina Surma
Tomas Orsava
Fedora Release Engineering
Ben Burton
Petr Viktorin
Lumir Balhar
Kalev Lember