The idea is that the extra subpackage only has requirements specific to that extra.
The logic however only excluded requirements without markers,
but requirements with *a* marker that was correct leaked to all extras subpackages.
E.g. with the following requirements:
Requires-Dist: base-dependency
Requires-Dist: base-dependency-with-matching-marker ; python_version < "3.15"
Requires-Dist: base-dependency-with-unmatching-marker ; python_version < "3.8"
Provides-Extra: an-extra
Requires-Dist: extra-only-dependency-with-matching-marker ; extra == 'an-extra' and python_version < "3.15"
Requires-Dist: extra-only-dependency-with-unmatching-marker ; extra == 'an-extra' and python_version < "3.8"
On Python 3.10, the base package generated the following requirements:
python3.10dist(base-dependency)
python3.10dist(base-dependency-with-matching-marker)
And for the [an-extra] extra:
python3.10dist(base-dependency-with-matching-marker) <--- REDUNDANT, WRONG
python3.10dist(extra-only-dependency-with-matching-marker)
Now we no longer just check if the marker evaluates to True,
but we also check that the same marker evaluates to False when the extra is not given.
A real package with this issue is build[virtualenv] 0.8.0, which we use for tests. The package has:
Requires-Dist: tomli (>=1.0.0) ; python_version < "3.11"
And on Python 3.10, it generated the following dependency for python3-build+virtualenv-0.8.0-2.fc37.noarch.rpm:
python3.10dist(tomli) >= 1
Now it no longer does. This is asserted in tests.
Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2090186
Upstream PR: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/python-rpm-packaging/pull/16
Improve handling of > operator, preventing post-release from satisfying most rpm requirements.
Improve handling of < operator, preventing pre-release from satisfying rpm requirement.
Improve handling of != operator with prefix matching, preventing pre-release from satisfying rpm requirements.
There were three problems:
- sys.version was not imported
- sys.version[:3] is not reliable on Python 3.10+
- distutils is deprecated on Python 3.10+
We were not hit by the missing import in Fedora because we only run the script
on .dist-info/.egg-info/.egg and not on .py files, so this if-branch never runs.
But when the script was fed with a .py path, it errored:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/rpm/pythondistdeps.py", line 344, in <module>
purelib = get_python_lib(standard_lib=0, plat_specific=0).split(version[:3])[0]
NameError: name 'version' is not defined
The sys.version[:3] thing kinda works for Python 3.10+ because *in this
particular case* splitting on '3.1' and taking the prefix yields the same
results as splitting on '3.10', but I consider that mere coincidence.
Finally, since the distutils import happened at module-level,
we got the Deprecation warning in all Fedora's Python packages:
/usr/lib/rpm/pythondistdeps.py:16: DeprecationWarning: The distutils package is deprecated and slated for removal in Python 3.12
Backported from https://github.com/rpm-software-management/python-rpm-packaging/commit/d12e039037
self.name in PathDistribution is a property in Python 3.10+ and thus we
can't redefine it as an instance variable. Instead we explicitly define
it as a property, which works on all supported Python versions.
Upstream change to importlib.metadata: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1317
Due to extras packages being hadled slightly differently by importlib,
one test case for this was added. And due to changes in handling
requires.txt files, comments were removed from the pyreq2rpm.tests
testing package.
Also because of the switch, we removed the dependency on setuptools and
added a dependency on packaging.
Note: Some packages with egg-info files might provide a different name
due to this change if there is a conflict between the filename and the
name in the metadata. Previously, the filename was sometimes used to
parse the name, now it is always the content of that file, which is what
packaging does, and thus also pip and other Python tooling. Currently,
this is known to affect only 1 package in Fedora (ntpsec).
The resulting script is different from upstream because of not yet upstreamed changes in Fedora:
- scripts/pythondistdeps: Rework error messages
- scripts/pythondistdeps: Add parameter --package-name
- scripts/pythondistdeps: Implement provides/requires for extras packages
- pythondistdeps.py: When parsing extras name, take the rightmost +
These changes are proposed in this upstream PR: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1546
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Disable_Python_2_Dist_RPM_Generators_and_Freeze_Python_2_Macros
The regex previously matched any Python version in a form of <single digit>.<at least one digit>.
Now it matches anything from 3.0 above: <single digit (3 or higher)>.<at least one digit>
It still does not match <multiple digits>.<at least one digit>, e.g. 11.0.
This is a breaking change, hence the version bump.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853597#c11
pkg_resources from setuptools 42+ no longer only use platform.python_version(),
but also platform.python_version_tuple() -- this was updated in packaging 19.1+.
This fix makes it work again with both new and old setuptools,
hopefully for some while.
bf069fe9dd86a443f318
See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-setuptools/pull-request/40
Strictly speaking, this is not an RPM generator, but:
- it generates provides
- it is tighly coupled with pythondistdeps.py
Usage:
1. Run `$ /usr/lib/rpm/pythonbundles.py .../vendored.txt`
2. Copy the output into the spec as a macro definition:
%global bundled %{expand:
Provides: bundled(python3dist(appdirs)) = 1.4.3
Provides: bundled(python3dist(packaging)) = 16.8
Provides: bundled(python3dist(pyparsing)) = 2.2.1
Provides: bundled(python3dist(six)) = 1.15
}
3. Use the macro to expand the provides
4. Verify the macro contents in %check:
%check
...
%{_rpmconfigdir}/pythonbundles.py src/_vendor/vendored.txt --compare-with '%{bundled}'
The %__python_magic filter suddenly got actually working with file 5.39:
Before:
file.cpython-38.opt-1.pyc: data
After:
file.cpython-38.opt-1.pyc: python 3.8 byte-compiled
Hence, the filter started to pick all Python files regardless of their location.
Later, in the actual generator, paths like this were considered:
/opt/usr/lib/python3.X/...
And generated requirements on python(abi).
We don't actually need to filter the files by file magic,
so we drop it to get the previously accidentally working behavior.
We could choose if the path and magic filters are applied as OR or AND.
However, we don't want either.
We actually want to mach any files in Python directories regardless of their magic.
We *could* filter by file type (and executable bit) for provides,
but that would require us to split the attr files into two.
