mold/0002-ELF-i386-Allow-R_386_P...

45 lines
1.9 KiB
Diff

From 2f5b3be6214d8157736e60f68693352a3ffd5a47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <2f5b3be6214d8157736e60f68693352a3ffd5a47.1666197268.git.github@sicherha.de>
In-Reply-To: <6c0c571d629d924e3f59d8710de6589848204e17.1666197268.git.github@sicherha.de>
References: <6c0c571d629d924e3f59d8710de6589848204e17.1666197268.git.github@sicherha.de>
From: Rui Ueyama <ruiu@bluewhale.systems>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 19:33:18 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] [ELF][i386] Allow R_386_PC32 after R_386_TLS_{GD,LDM}
I don't know why GCC sometimes creates a PC32 relocation instead of
PLT32 after a TLS_GD/TLS_LDM. I believe it's strictly speaking a
violation of the psABI. But we need to handle such input.
Fixes https://github.com/rui314/mold/issues/794
---
elf/arch-i386.cc | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/elf/arch-i386.cc b/elf/arch-i386.cc
index 46391844..20563faa 100644
--- a/elf/arch-i386.cc
+++ b/elf/arch-i386.cc
@@ -485,7 +485,8 @@ void InputSection<E>::scan_relocations(Context<E> &ctx) {
Fatal(ctx) << *this << ": TLS_GD reloc must be followed by PLT or GOT32";
if (u32 ty = rels[i + 1].r_type;
- ty != R_386_PLT32 && ty != R_386_GOT32 && ty != R_386_GOT32X)
+ ty != R_386_PLT32 && ty != R_386_PC32 &&
+ ty != R_386_GOT32 && ty != R_386_GOT32X)
Fatal(ctx) << *this << ": TLS_GD reloc must be followed by PLT or GOT32";
if (relax_tlsgd(ctx, sym))
@@ -498,7 +499,8 @@ void InputSection<E>::scan_relocations(Context<E> &ctx) {
Fatal(ctx) << *this << ": TLS_LDM reloc must be followed by PLT or GOT32";
if (u32 ty = rels[i + 1].r_type;
- ty != R_386_PLT32 && ty != R_386_GOT32 && ty != R_386_GOT32X)
+ ty != R_386_PLT32 && ty != R_386_PC32 &&
+ ty != R_386_GOT32 && ty != R_386_GOT32X)
Fatal(ctx) << *this << ": TLS_LDM reloc must be followed by PLT or GOT32";
if (relax_tlsld(ctx))
--
2.37.3