As far as I can tell there should not be any effect visible outside of
RPM database and fedora-review tool.
This change is needed to make lua-libs package + *other* Lua packages
compliant with packaging guidelines.
Formerly the lua-libs package put a library /usr/lib64/lua/5.3 directory
but did not own the directory itself. This is being flagged by
fedora-review as non-compliance.
This problem affected other Lua packages which put library into
/usr/lib64/lua/5.3 as well. These other libraries were always flagged
by fedora-review as non-compliant because the library package did not
Require a package which owns /usr/lib64/lua/5.3.
(The build system autogenerates depedency on lua-libs which did not own
the directory.)
bc0f275b1e