rpms
/
lua
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

move ownership of /usr/share/lua/5.3 and /usr/lib64/lua/5.3 to lua-libs 

As far as I can tell there should not be any effect visible outside of
RPM database and fedora-review tool.

This change is needed to make lua-libs package + *other* Lua packages
compliant with packaging guidelines.

Formerly the lua-libs package put a library /usr/lib64/lua/5.3 directory
but did not own the directory itself. This is being flagged by
fedora-review as non-compliance.

This problem affected other Lua packages which put library into
/usr/lib64/lua/5.3 as well. These other libraries were always flagged
by fedora-review as non-compliant because the library package did not
Require a package which owns /usr/lib64/lua/5.3.
(The build system autogenerates depedency on lua-libs which did not own
the directory.)
This commit is contained in:
Petr Špaček 2018-07-18 12:28:45 +02:00
parent d10681a367
commit bc0f275b1e
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: CE8DD6A1A50A21E4
1 changed files with 5 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

11
lua.spec
View File

@ -188,20 +188,19 @@ install -Dpm 0644 %{SOURCE1000} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{macrosdir}/macros.lua
%doc README doc/*.html doc/*.css doc/*.gif doc/*.png
%{_bindir}/lua
%{_bindir}/luac
%if 0%{?bootstrap}
%dir %{_libdir}/lua/%{bootstrap_major_version}
%dir %{_datadir}/lua/%{bootstrap_major_version}
%endif
%{_mandir}/man1/lua*.1*
%files libs
%dir %{_libdir}/lua
%dir %{_libdir}/lua/%{major_version}
%{_libdir}/liblua-%{major_version}.so
%dir %{_datadir}/lua
%dir %{_datadir}/lua/%{major_version}
%files libs
%{_libdir}/liblua-%{major_version}.so
%if 0%{?bootstrap}
%dir %{_libdir}/lua/%{bootstrap_major_version}
%{_libdir}/liblua-%{bootstrap_major_version}.so
%dir %{_datadir}/lua/%{bootstrap_major_version}
%endif
%files devel