llvm/0002-Reinstantiate-old-bad-deduplication-logic-that-was-r.patch
2018-02-01 20:41:11 +00:00

43 lines
1.7 KiB
Diff

From ca865fbaa493ff3250db39786c41658037e456ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Jasper <djasper@google.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 13:25:05 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Reinstantiate old/bad deduplication logic that was
removed in r315279.
While this shouldn't be necessary anymore, we have cases where we run
into the assertion below, i.e. cases with two non-fragment entries for the
same variable at different frame indices.
This should be fixed, but for now, we should revert to a version that
does not trigger asserts.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@315576 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---
lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp
index 90f6f2f..064450f 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp
@@ -219,6 +219,16 @@ void DbgVariable::addMMIEntry(const DbgVariable &V) {
assert(!FrameIndexExprs.empty() && "Expected an MMI entry");
assert(!V.FrameIndexExprs.empty() && "Expected an MMI entry");
+ // FIXME: This logic should not be necessary anymore, as we now have proper
+ // deduplication. However, without it, we currently run into the assertion
+ // below, which means that we are likely dealing with broken input, i.e. two
+ // non-fragment entries for the same variable at different frame indices.
+ if (FrameIndexExprs.size()) {
+ auto *Expr = FrameIndexExprs.back().Expr;
+ if (!Expr || !Expr->isFragment())
+ return;
+ }
+
for (const auto &FIE : V.FrameIndexExprs)
// Ignore duplicate entries.
if (llvm::none_of(FrameIndexExprs, [&](const FrameIndexExpr &Other) {
--
1.8.3.1