From b19efb53ae009e5b91543d8c846d38625dc3eab0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chuck Ebbert Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 19:35:21 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Fix description of AMD errata patch --- x86-amd-fix-another-erratum-400-bug.patch | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/x86-amd-fix-another-erratum-400-bug.patch b/x86-amd-fix-another-erratum-400-bug.patch index f07e1a334..4afc0af6d 100644 --- a/x86-amd-fix-another-erratum-400-bug.patch +++ b/x86-amd-fix-another-erratum-400-bug.patch @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ relied on that if it was present and usable. Patch (2) switched the checking for erratum 400 to use the new framework. But the original code checked for an explicit model range -first, then used OSVW if the CPU was not within that range. Patch (1) +first, then used OSVW if the CPU was not within that range. Patch (2) also inexplicably added a second model range (for Family 10h) that was never in the original code.