Linux v4.4.1

This commit is contained in:
Laura Abbott 2016-02-01 12:01:28 -08:00
parent 8d728edd00
commit 927ec95fb5
4 changed files with 5 additions and 225 deletions

View File

@ -1,78 +0,0 @@
From 05fd13592b60c3e9873f56705f80ff934e98b046 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:53:31 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] KEYS: Fix keyring ref leak in join_session_keyring()
This fixes CVE-2016-0728.
If a thread is asked to join as a session keyring the keyring that's already
set as its session, we leak a keyring reference.
This can be tested with the following program:
#include <stddef.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <keyutils.h>
int main(int argc, const char *argv[])
{
int i = 0;
key_serial_t serial;
serial = keyctl(KEYCTL_JOIN_SESSION_KEYRING,
"leaked-keyring");
if (serial < 0) {
perror("keyctl");
return -1;
}
if (keyctl(KEYCTL_SETPERM, serial,
KEY_POS_ALL | KEY_USR_ALL) < 0) {
perror("keyctl");
return -1;
}
for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
serial = keyctl(KEYCTL_JOIN_SESSION_KEYRING,
"leaked-keyring");
if (serial < 0) {
perror("keyctl");
return -1;
}
}
return 0;
}
If, after the program has run, there something like the following line in
/proc/keys:
3f3d898f I--Q--- 100 perm 3f3f0000 0 0 keyring leaked-keyring: empty
with a usage count of 100 * the number of times the program has been run,
then the kernel is malfunctioning. If leaked-keyring has zero usages or
has been garbage collected, then the problem is fixed.
Reported-by: Yevgeny Pats <yevgeny@perception-point.io>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
RH-bugzilla: 1298036
---
security/keys/process_keys.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/security/keys/process_keys.c b/security/keys/process_keys.c
index 43b4cddbf2b3..7877e5cd4e23 100644
--- a/security/keys/process_keys.c
+++ b/security/keys/process_keys.c
@@ -794,6 +794,7 @@ long join_session_keyring(const char *name)
ret = PTR_ERR(keyring);
goto error2;
} else if (keyring == new->session_keyring) {
+ key_put(keyring);
ret = 0;
goto error2;
}
--
2.5.0

View File

@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ Summary: The Linux kernel
%if 0%{?released_kernel}
# Do we have a -stable update to apply?
%define stable_update 0
%define stable_update 1
# Set rpm version accordingly
%if 0%{?stable_update}
%define stablerev %{stable_update}
@ -606,12 +606,6 @@ Patch604: drm-i915-shut-up-gen8-SDE-irq-dmesg-noise-again.patch
#rhbz 1296677
Patch641: HID-multitouch-fix-input-mode-switching-on-some-Elan.patch
#CVE-2016-0728 rhbz 1296623 1297475
Patch634: KEYS-Fix-keyring-ref-leak-in-join_session_keyring.patch
#CVE-2013-4312 rhbz 1297813 1300216
Patch636: unix-properly-account-for-FDs-passed-over-unix-socke.patch
#CVE-2016-0723 rhbz 1296253 1300224
Patch637: tty-Fix-unsafe-ldisc-reference-via-ioctl-TIOCGETD.patch
@ -2077,6 +2071,9 @@ fi
#
#
%changelog
* Mon Feb 01 2016 Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org>
- Linux v4.4.1
* Fri Jan 29 2016 Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>
- Backport HID sony patch to fix some gamepads (rhbz 1255235)

View File

@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
9a78fa2eb6c68ca5a40ed5af08142599 linux-4.4.tar.xz
dcbc8fe378a676d5d0dd208cf524e144 perf-man-4.4.tar.gz
d9e951895c8c249f0bf52d85f3e63bce patch-4.4.1.xz

View File

@ -1,140 +0,0 @@
From 0cd038d23b86853d68993c94f3c713e4375fd61f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: willy tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 07:54:56 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] unix: properly account for FDs passed over unix sockets
It is possible for a process to allocate and accumulate far more FDs than
the process' limit by sending them over a unix socket then closing them
to keep the process' fd count low.
This change addresses this problem by keeping track of the number of FDs
in flight per user and preventing non-privileged processes from having
more FDs in flight than their configured FD limit.
Reported-by: socketpair@gmail.com
Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Mitigates: CVE-2013-4312 (Linux 2.0+)
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
net/unix/af_unix.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
net/unix/garbage.c | 13 ++++++++-----
3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index b7b9501b41af..f477e87ca46f 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -830,6 +830,7 @@ struct user_struct {
unsigned long mq_bytes; /* How many bytes can be allocated to mqueue? */
#endif
unsigned long locked_shm; /* How many pages of mlocked shm ? */
+ unsigned long unix_inflight; /* How many files in flight in unix sockets */
#ifdef CONFIG_KEYS
struct key *uid_keyring; /* UID specific keyring */
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 128b0982c96b..9085de63bb81 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -1498,6 +1498,21 @@ static void unix_destruct_scm(struct sk_buff *skb)
sock_wfree(skb);
}
+/*
+ * The "user->unix_inflight" variable is protected by the garbage
+ * collection lock, and we just read it locklessly here. If you go
+ * over the limit, there might be a tiny race in actually noticing
+ * it across threads. Tough.
+ */
+static inline bool too_many_unix_fds(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ struct user_struct *user = current_user();
+
+ if (unlikely(user->unix_inflight > task_rlimit(p, RLIMIT_NOFILE)))
+ return !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN);
+ return false;
+}
+
#define MAX_RECURSION_LEVEL 4
static int unix_attach_fds(struct scm_cookie *scm, struct sk_buff *skb)
@@ -1506,6 +1521,9 @@ static int unix_attach_fds(struct scm_cookie *scm, struct sk_buff *skb)
unsigned char max_level = 0;
int unix_sock_count = 0;
+ if (too_many_unix_fds(current))
+ return -ETOOMANYREFS;
+
for (i = scm->fp->count - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
struct sock *sk = unix_get_socket(scm->fp->fp[i]);
@@ -1527,10 +1545,8 @@ static int unix_attach_fds(struct scm_cookie *scm, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (!UNIXCB(skb).fp)
return -ENOMEM;
- if (unix_sock_count) {
- for (i = scm->fp->count - 1; i >= 0; i--)
- unix_inflight(scm->fp->fp[i]);
- }
+ for (i = scm->fp->count - 1; i >= 0; i--)
+ unix_inflight(scm->fp->fp[i]);
return max_level;
}
diff --git a/net/unix/garbage.c b/net/unix/garbage.c
index a73a226f2d33..8fcdc2283af5 100644
--- a/net/unix/garbage.c
+++ b/net/unix/garbage.c
@@ -120,11 +120,11 @@ void unix_inflight(struct file *fp)
{
struct sock *s = unix_get_socket(fp);
+ spin_lock(&unix_gc_lock);
+
if (s) {
struct unix_sock *u = unix_sk(s);
- spin_lock(&unix_gc_lock);
-
if (atomic_long_inc_return(&u->inflight) == 1) {
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&u->link));
list_add_tail(&u->link, &gc_inflight_list);
@@ -132,25 +132,28 @@ void unix_inflight(struct file *fp)
BUG_ON(list_empty(&u->link));
}
unix_tot_inflight++;
- spin_unlock(&unix_gc_lock);
}
+ fp->f_cred->user->unix_inflight++;
+ spin_unlock(&unix_gc_lock);
}
void unix_notinflight(struct file *fp)
{
struct sock *s = unix_get_socket(fp);
+ spin_lock(&unix_gc_lock);
+
if (s) {
struct unix_sock *u = unix_sk(s);
- spin_lock(&unix_gc_lock);
BUG_ON(list_empty(&u->link));
if (atomic_long_dec_and_test(&u->inflight))
list_del_init(&u->link);
unix_tot_inflight--;
- spin_unlock(&unix_gc_lock);
}
+ fp->f_cred->user->unix_inflight--;
+ spin_unlock(&unix_gc_lock);
}
static void scan_inflight(struct sock *x, void (*func)(struct unix_sock *),
--
2.5.0