From 33fb0f27577c1cb87828d3aa16de25bb27cfead5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hans de Goede Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:18:30 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Fix only 1 monitor working on DP-MST docking stations (rhbz 1809681) Fix backtraces on various buggy BIOS-es (rhbz 1564895, 1808874) Add /etc/modprobe.d/floppy-blacklist.conf to fix auto-loading of the legacy floppy driver (rhbz 1789155) --- drm-dp-mst-error-handling-improvements.patch | 471 +++++++++++++++ drm-dp-mst-fixes.patch | 578 +++++++++++++++++++ iommu-WARN_TAINT-fixes.patch | 164 ++++++ kernel.spec | 17 + mod-extra-blacklist.sh | 8 + 5 files changed, 1238 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drm-dp-mst-error-handling-improvements.patch create mode 100644 drm-dp-mst-fixes.patch create mode 100644 iommu-WARN_TAINT-fixes.patch diff --git a/drm-dp-mst-error-handling-improvements.patch b/drm-dp-mst-error-handling-improvements.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000..91e396940 --- /dev/null +++ b/drm-dp-mst-error-handling-improvements.patch @@ -0,0 +1,471 @@ +From 52bd42038880354565bd5ca0bcc1d24b15136b0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Benjamin Gaignard +Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 09:48:42 +0100 +Subject: [PATCH 1/3] drm/dp_mst: Fix W=1 warnings + +Fix the warnings that show up with W=1. +They are all about unused but set variables. +If functions returns are not used anymore make them void. + +Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard +Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul +Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200205084842.5642-1-benjamin.gaignard@st.com +--- + drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 114 +++++++++++++++----------- + 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +index 415bd0770eab..95e08d908dd2 100644 +--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c ++++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +@@ -1035,7 +1035,8 @@ static bool drm_dp_sideband_parse_req(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_rx *raw, + } + } + +-static int build_dpcd_write(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *msg, u8 port_num, u32 offset, u8 num_bytes, u8 *bytes) ++static void build_dpcd_write(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *msg, ++ u8 port_num, u32 offset, u8 num_bytes, u8 *bytes) + { + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body req; + +@@ -1045,17 +1046,14 @@ static int build_dpcd_write(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *msg, u8 port_num, u32 + req.u.dpcd_write.num_bytes = num_bytes; + req.u.dpcd_write.bytes = bytes; + drm_dp_encode_sideband_req(&req, msg); +- +- return 0; + } + +-static int build_link_address(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *msg) ++static void build_link_address(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *msg) + { + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body req; + + req.req_type = DP_LINK_ADDRESS; + drm_dp_encode_sideband_req(&req, msg); +- return 0; + } + + static int build_clear_payload_id_table(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *msg) +@@ -1067,7 +1065,8 @@ static int build_clear_payload_id_table(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *msg) + return 0; + } + +-static int build_enum_path_resources(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *msg, int port_num) ++static int build_enum_path_resources(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *msg, ++ int port_num) + { + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body req; + +@@ -1078,10 +1077,11 @@ static int build_enum_path_resources(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *msg, int por + return 0; + } + +-static int build_allocate_payload(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *msg, int port_num, +- u8 vcpi, uint16_t pbn, +- u8 number_sdp_streams, +- u8 *sdp_stream_sink) ++static void build_allocate_payload(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *msg, ++ int port_num, ++ u8 vcpi, uint16_t pbn, ++ u8 number_sdp_streams, ++ u8 *sdp_stream_sink) + { + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body req; + memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req)); +@@ -1094,11 +1094,10 @@ static int build_allocate_payload(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *msg, int port_n + number_sdp_streams); + drm_dp_encode_sideband_req(&req, msg); + msg->path_msg = true; +- return 0; + } + +-static int build_power_updown_phy(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *msg, +- int port_num, bool power_up) ++static void build_power_updown_phy(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *msg, ++ int port_num, bool power_up) + { + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body req; + +@@ -1110,7 +1109,6 @@ static int build_power_updown_phy(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *msg, + req.u.port_num.port_number = port_num; + drm_dp_encode_sideband_req(&req, msg); + msg->path_msg = true; +- return 0; + } + + static int drm_dp_mst_assign_payload_id(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, +@@ -2073,29 +2071,24 @@ ssize_t drm_dp_mst_dpcd_write(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, + offset, size, buffer); + } + +-static void drm_dp_check_mstb_guid(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, u8 *guid) ++static int drm_dp_check_mstb_guid(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, u8 *guid) + { +- int ret; ++ int ret = 0; + + memcpy(mstb->guid, guid, 16); + + if (!drm_dp_validate_guid(mstb->mgr, mstb->guid)) { + if (mstb->port_parent) { +- ret = drm_dp_send_dpcd_write( +- mstb->mgr, +- mstb->port_parent, +- DP_GUID, +- 16, +- mstb->guid); ++ ret = drm_dp_send_dpcd_write(mstb->mgr, ++ mstb->port_parent, ++ DP_GUID, 16, mstb->guid); + } else { +- +- ret = drm_dp_dpcd_write( +- mstb->mgr->aux, +- DP_GUID, +- mstb->guid, +- 16); ++ ret = drm_dp_dpcd_write(mstb->mgr->aux, ++ DP_GUID, mstb->guid, 16); + } + } ++ ++ return ret; + } + + static void build_mst_prop_path(const struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, +@@ -2641,7 +2634,8 @@ static bool drm_dp_validate_guid(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, + return false; + } + +-static int build_dpcd_read(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *msg, u8 port_num, u32 offset, u8 num_bytes) ++static void build_dpcd_read(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *msg, ++ u8 port_num, u32 offset, u8 num_bytes) + { + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body req; + +@@ -2650,8 +2644,6 @@ static int build_dpcd_read(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *msg, u8 port_num, u32 + req.u.dpcd_read.dpcd_address = offset; + req.u.dpcd_read.num_bytes = num_bytes; + drm_dp_encode_sideband_req(&req, msg); +- +- return 0; + } + + static int drm_dp_send_sideband_msg(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, +@@ -2877,7 +2869,7 @@ static int drm_dp_send_link_address(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *txmsg; + struct drm_dp_link_address_ack_reply *reply; + struct drm_dp_mst_port *port, *tmp; +- int i, len, ret, port_mask = 0; ++ int i, ret, port_mask = 0; + bool changed = false; + + txmsg = kzalloc(sizeof(*txmsg), GFP_KERNEL); +@@ -2885,7 +2877,7 @@ static int drm_dp_send_link_address(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, + return -ENOMEM; + + txmsg->dst = mstb; +- len = build_link_address(txmsg); ++ build_link_address(txmsg); + + mstb->link_address_sent = true; + drm_dp_queue_down_tx(mgr, txmsg); +@@ -2906,7 +2898,9 @@ static int drm_dp_send_link_address(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("link address reply: %d\n", reply->nports); + drm_dp_dump_link_address(reply); + +- drm_dp_check_mstb_guid(mstb, reply->guid); ++ ret = drm_dp_check_mstb_guid(mstb, reply->guid); ++ if (ret) ++ goto out; + + for (i = 0; i < reply->nports; i++) { + port_mask |= BIT(reply->ports[i].port_number); +@@ -2947,14 +2941,14 @@ void drm_dp_send_clear_payload_id_table(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, + struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb) + { + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *txmsg; +- int len, ret; ++ int ret; + + txmsg = kzalloc(sizeof(*txmsg), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!txmsg) + return; + + txmsg->dst = mstb; +- len = build_clear_payload_id_table(txmsg); ++ build_clear_payload_id_table(txmsg); + + drm_dp_queue_down_tx(mgr, txmsg); + +@@ -2972,7 +2966,6 @@ drm_dp_send_enum_path_resources(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, + { + struct drm_dp_enum_path_resources_ack_reply *path_res; + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *txmsg; +- int len; + int ret; + + txmsg = kzalloc(sizeof(*txmsg), GFP_KERNEL); +@@ -2980,7 +2973,7 @@ drm_dp_send_enum_path_resources(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, + return -ENOMEM; + + txmsg->dst = mstb; +- len = build_enum_path_resources(txmsg, port->port_num); ++ build_enum_path_resources(txmsg, port->port_num); + + drm_dp_queue_down_tx(mgr, txmsg); + +@@ -3073,7 +3066,7 @@ static int drm_dp_payload_send_msg(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, + { + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *txmsg; + struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb; +- int len, ret, port_num; ++ int ret, port_num; + u8 sinks[DRM_DP_MAX_SDP_STREAMS]; + int i; + +@@ -3098,9 +3091,9 @@ static int drm_dp_payload_send_msg(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, + sinks[i] = i; + + txmsg->dst = mstb; +- len = build_allocate_payload(txmsg, port_num, +- id, +- pbn, port->num_sdp_streams, sinks); ++ build_allocate_payload(txmsg, port_num, ++ id, ++ pbn, port->num_sdp_streams, sinks); + + drm_dp_queue_down_tx(mgr, txmsg); + +@@ -3129,7 +3122,7 @@ int drm_dp_send_power_updown_phy(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, + struct drm_dp_mst_port *port, bool power_up) + { + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *txmsg; +- int len, ret; ++ int ret; + + port = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated(mgr, port); + if (!port) +@@ -3142,7 +3135,7 @@ int drm_dp_send_power_updown_phy(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, + } + + txmsg->dst = port->parent; +- len = build_power_updown_phy(txmsg, port->port_num, power_up); ++ build_power_updown_phy(txmsg, port->port_num, power_up); + drm_dp_queue_down_tx(mgr, txmsg); + + ret = drm_dp_mst_wait_tx_reply(port->parent, txmsg); +@@ -3364,7 +3357,6 @@ static int drm_dp_send_dpcd_read(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, + struct drm_dp_mst_port *port, + int offset, int size, u8 *bytes) + { +- int len; + int ret = 0; + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *txmsg; + struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb; +@@ -3379,7 +3371,7 @@ static int drm_dp_send_dpcd_read(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, + goto fail_put; + } + +- len = build_dpcd_read(txmsg, port->port_num, offset, size); ++ build_dpcd_read(txmsg, port->port_num, offset, size); + txmsg->dst = port->parent; + + drm_dp_queue_down_tx(mgr, txmsg); +@@ -3417,7 +3409,6 @@ static int drm_dp_send_dpcd_write(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, + struct drm_dp_mst_port *port, + int offset, int size, u8 *bytes) + { +- int len; + int ret; + struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *txmsg; + struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb; +@@ -3432,7 +3423,7 @@ static int drm_dp_send_dpcd_write(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, + goto fail_put; + } + +- len = build_dpcd_write(txmsg, port->port_num, offset, size, bytes); ++ build_dpcd_write(txmsg, port->port_num, offset, size, bytes); + txmsg->dst = mstb; + + drm_dp_queue_down_tx(mgr, txmsg); +@@ -3682,7 +3673,12 @@ int drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_resume(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("dpcd read failed - undocked during suspend?\n"); + goto out_fail; + } +- drm_dp_check_mstb_guid(mgr->mst_primary, guid); ++ ++ ret = drm_dp_check_mstb_guid(mgr->mst_primary, guid); ++ if (ret) { ++ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("check mstb failed - undocked during suspend?\n"); ++ goto out_fail; ++ } + + /* + * For the final step of resuming the topology, we need to bring the +@@ -4625,15 +4621,34 @@ void drm_dp_mst_dump_topology(struct seq_file *m, + int ret; + + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read(mgr->aux, DP_DPCD_REV, buf, DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE); ++ if (ret) { ++ seq_printf(m, "dpcd read failed\n"); ++ goto out; ++ } + seq_printf(m, "dpcd: %*ph\n", DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE, buf); ++ + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read(mgr->aux, DP_FAUX_CAP, buf, 2); ++ if (ret) { ++ seq_printf(m, "faux/mst read failed\n"); ++ goto out; ++ } + seq_printf(m, "faux/mst: %*ph\n", 2, buf); ++ + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read(mgr->aux, DP_MSTM_CTRL, buf, 1); ++ if (ret) { ++ seq_printf(m, "mst ctrl read failed\n"); ++ goto out; ++ } + seq_printf(m, "mst ctrl: %*ph\n", 1, buf); + + /* dump the standard OUI branch header */ + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read(mgr->aux, DP_BRANCH_OUI, buf, DP_BRANCH_OUI_HEADER_SIZE); ++ if (ret) { ++ seq_printf(m, "branch oui read failed\n"); ++ goto out; ++ } + seq_printf(m, "branch oui: %*phN devid: ", 3, buf); ++ + for (i = 0x3; i < 0x8 && buf[i]; i++) + seq_printf(m, "%c", buf[i]); + seq_printf(m, " revision: hw: %x.%x sw: %x.%x\n", +@@ -4642,6 +4657,7 @@ void drm_dp_mst_dump_topology(struct seq_file *m, + seq_printf(m, "payload table: %*ph\n", DP_PAYLOAD_TABLE_SIZE, buf); + } + ++out: + mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock); + + } +-- +2.25.1 + +From 9004e704af8486da3dcbde0fb35a2a309152a5c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Lyude Paul +Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 18:49:21 -0500 +Subject: [PATCH 2/3] drm/dp_mst: Make drm_dp_mst_dpcd_write() consistent with + drm_dp_dpcd_write() + +Noticed this while having some problems with hubs sometimes not being +detected on the first plug. Every single dpcd read or write function +returns the number of bytes transferred on success or a negative error +code, except apparently for drm_dp_mst_dpcd_write() - which returns 0 on +success. + +There's not really any good reason for this difference that I can tell, +and having the two functions give differing behavior means that +drm_dp_dpcd_write() will end up returning 0 on success for MST devices, +but the number of bytes transferred for everything else. + +So, fix that and update the kernel doc. + +Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul +Fixes: 2f221a5efed4 ("drm/dp_mst: Add MST support to DP DPCD R/W functions") +Cc: Hans de Goede +Cc: Mikita Lipski +Cc: Sean Paul +--- + drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 11 ++++------- + 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +index 95e08d908dd2..2dc1c0ba456b 100644 +--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c ++++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +@@ -2059,7 +2059,7 @@ ssize_t drm_dp_mst_dpcd_read(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, + * sideband messaging as drm_dp_dpcd_write() does for local + * devices via actual AUX CH. + * +- * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on failure. ++ * Return: number of bytes written on success, negative error code on failure. + */ + ssize_t drm_dp_mst_dpcd_write(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, + unsigned int offset, void *buffer, size_t size) +@@ -3429,12 +3429,9 @@ static int drm_dp_send_dpcd_write(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, + drm_dp_queue_down_tx(mgr, txmsg); + + ret = drm_dp_mst_wait_tx_reply(mstb, txmsg); +- if (ret > 0) { +- if (txmsg->reply.reply_type == DP_SIDEBAND_REPLY_NAK) +- ret = -EIO; +- else +- ret = 0; +- } ++ if (ret > 0 && txmsg->reply.reply_type == DP_SIDEBAND_REPLY_NAK) ++ ret = -EIO; ++ + kfree(txmsg); + fail_put: + drm_dp_mst_topology_put_mstb(mstb); +-- +2.25.1 + +From ff18e1a7ef709cdd3dcbf7b4ae2b37e1c6695289 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Lyude Paul +Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 18:49:22 -0500 +Subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/dp_mst: Fix drm_dp_check_mstb_guid() return code + +We actually expect this to return a 0 on success, or negative error code +on failure. In order to do that, we check whether or not we managed to +write the whole GUID and then return 0 if so, otherwise return a +negative error code. Also, let's add an error message here so it's a +little more obvious when this fails in the middle of a link address +probe. + +This should fix issues with certain MST hubs seemingly stopping for no +reason in the middle of the link address probe process. + +Fixes: cb897542c6d2 ("drm/dp_mst: Fix W=1 warnings") +Cc: Benjamin Gaignard +Cc: Sean Paul +Cc: Hans de Goede +Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul +--- + drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 13 +++++++++++-- + 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +index 2dc1c0ba456b..d0e5993b0622 100644 +--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c ++++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +@@ -2088,7 +2088,10 @@ static int drm_dp_check_mstb_guid(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, u8 *guid) + } + } + +- return ret; ++ if (ret < 16 && ret > 0) ++ return -EPROTO; ++ ++ return ret == 16 ? 0 : ret; + } + + static void build_mst_prop_path(const struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, +@@ -2899,8 +2902,14 @@ static int drm_dp_send_link_address(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, + drm_dp_dump_link_address(reply); + + ret = drm_dp_check_mstb_guid(mstb, reply->guid); +- if (ret) ++ if (ret) { ++ char buf[64]; ++ ++ drm_dp_mst_rad_to_str(mstb->rad, mstb->lct, buf, sizeof(buf)); ++ DRM_ERROR("GUID check on %s failed: %d\n", ++ buf, ret); + goto out; ++ } + + for (i = 0; i < reply->nports; i++) { + port_mask |= BIT(reply->ports[i].port_number); +-- +2.25.1 + diff --git a/drm-dp-mst-fixes.patch b/drm-dp-mst-fixes.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d1e61f17d --- /dev/null +++ b/drm-dp-mst-fixes.patch @@ -0,0 +1,578 @@ +From 5118c9aeafecbfa5c2a49d757c882c6033828e7e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Lyude Paul +Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 18:46:19 -0500 +Subject: [PATCH 1/4] drm/dp_mst: Rename drm_dp_mst_is_dp_mst_end_device() to + be less redundant + +It's already prefixed by dp_mst, so we don't really need to repeat +ourselves here. One of the changes I should have picked up originally +when reviewing MST DSC support. + +There should be no functional changes here + +Cc: Mikita Lipski +Cc: Sean Paul +Cc: Hans de Goede +Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul +--- + drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 10 +++++----- + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +index cce0b1bba591..9188c53f5c96 100644 +--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c ++++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +@@ -1935,7 +1935,7 @@ static u8 drm_dp_calculate_rad(struct drm_dp_mst_port *port, + return parent_lct + 1; + } + +-static bool drm_dp_mst_is_dp_mst_end_device(u8 pdt, bool mcs) ++static bool drm_dp_mst_is_end_device(u8 pdt, bool mcs) + { + switch (pdt) { + case DP_PEER_DEVICE_DP_LEGACY_CONV: +@@ -1965,13 +1965,13 @@ drm_dp_port_set_pdt(struct drm_dp_mst_port *port, u8 new_pdt, + + /* Teardown the old pdt, if there is one */ + if (port->pdt != DP_PEER_DEVICE_NONE) { +- if (drm_dp_mst_is_dp_mst_end_device(port->pdt, port->mcs)) { ++ if (drm_dp_mst_is_end_device(port->pdt, port->mcs)) { + /* + * If the new PDT would also have an i2c bus, + * don't bother with reregistering it + */ + if (new_pdt != DP_PEER_DEVICE_NONE && +- drm_dp_mst_is_dp_mst_end_device(new_pdt, new_mcs)) { ++ drm_dp_mst_is_end_device(new_pdt, new_mcs)) { + port->pdt = new_pdt; + port->mcs = new_mcs; + return 0; +@@ -1991,7 +1991,7 @@ drm_dp_port_set_pdt(struct drm_dp_mst_port *port, u8 new_pdt, + port->mcs = new_mcs; + + if (port->pdt != DP_PEER_DEVICE_NONE) { +- if (drm_dp_mst_is_dp_mst_end_device(port->pdt, port->mcs)) { ++ if (drm_dp_mst_is_end_device(port->pdt, port->mcs)) { + /* add i2c over sideband */ + ret = drm_dp_mst_register_i2c_bus(&port->aux); + } else { +@@ -2172,7 +2172,7 @@ drm_dp_mst_port_add_connector(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, + } + + if (port->pdt != DP_PEER_DEVICE_NONE && +- drm_dp_mst_is_dp_mst_end_device(port->pdt, port->mcs)) { ++ drm_dp_mst_is_end_device(port->pdt, port->mcs)) { + port->cached_edid = drm_get_edid(port->connector, + &port->aux.ddc); + drm_connector_set_tile_property(port->connector); +-- +2.25.1 + +From 270862e1b736dc0e7c56a48fbb61b5ec76236982 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Lyude Paul +Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 18:46:20 -0500 +Subject: [PATCH 2/4] drm/dp_mst: Use full_pbn instead of available_pbn for + bandwidth checks + +DisplayPort specifications are fun. For a while, it's been really +unclear to us what available_pbn actually does. There's a somewhat vague +explanation in the DisplayPort spec (starting from 1.2) that partially +explains it: + + The minimum payload bandwidth number supported by the path. Each node + updates this number with its available payload bandwidth number if its + payload bandwidth number is less than that in the Message Transaction + reply. + +So, it sounds like available_pbn represents the smallest link rate in +use between the source and the branch device. Cool, so full_pbn is just +the highest possible PBN that the branch device supports right? + +Well, we assumed that for quite a while until Sean Paul noticed that on +some MST hubs, available_pbn will actually get set to 0 whenever there's +any active payloads on the respective branch device. This caused quite a +bit of confusion since clearing the payload ID table would end up fixing +the available_pbn value. + +So, we just went with that until commit cd82d82cbc04 ("drm/dp_mst: Add +branch bandwidth validation to MST atomic check") started breaking +people's setups due to us getting erroneous available_pbn values. So, we +did some more digging and got confused until we finally looked at the +definition for full_pbn: + + The bandwidth of the link at the trained link rate and lane count + between the DP Source device and the DP Sink device with no time slots + allocated to VC Payloads, represented as a Payload Bandwidth Number. As + with the Available_Payload_Bandwidth_Number, this number is determined + by the link with the lowest lane count and link rate. + +That's what we get for not reading specs closely enough, hehe. So, since +full_pbn is definitely what we want for doing bandwidth restriction +checks - let's start using that instead and ignore available_pbn +entirely. + +Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul +Fixes: cd82d82cbc04 ("drm/dp_mst: Add branch bandwidth validation to MST atomic check") +Cc: Mikita Lipski +Cc: Hans de Goede +Cc: Sean Paul +--- + drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 15 +++++++-------- + include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h | 4 ++-- + 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +index 9188c53f5c96..7df7676b45c4 100644 +--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c ++++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +@@ -2309,7 +2309,7 @@ drm_dp_mst_handle_link_address_port(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, + port); + } + } else { +- port->available_pbn = 0; ++ port->full_pbn = 0; + } + } + +@@ -2404,7 +2404,7 @@ drm_dp_mst_handle_conn_stat(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, + if (port->ddps) { + dowork = true; + } else { +- port->available_pbn = 0; ++ port->full_pbn = 0; + } + } + +@@ -2556,7 +2556,7 @@ static int drm_dp_check_and_send_link_address(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mg + if (port->input || !port->ddps) + continue; + +- if (!port->available_pbn) { ++ if (!port->full_pbn) { + drm_modeset_lock(&mgr->base.lock, NULL); + drm_dp_send_enum_path_resources(mgr, mstb, port); + drm_modeset_unlock(&mgr->base.lock); +@@ -3002,8 +3002,7 @@ drm_dp_send_enum_path_resources(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, + path_res->port_number, + path_res->full_payload_bw_number, + path_res->avail_payload_bw_number); +- port->available_pbn = +- path_res->avail_payload_bw_number; ++ port->full_pbn = path_res->full_payload_bw_number; + port->fec_capable = path_res->fec_capable; + } + } +@@ -3598,7 +3597,7 @@ drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_invalidate_mstb(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb) + + list_for_each_entry(port, &mstb->ports, next) { + /* The PBN for each port will also need to be re-probed */ +- port->available_pbn = 0; ++ port->full_pbn = 0; + + if (port->mstb) + drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_invalidate_mstb(port->mstb); +@@ -4842,8 +4841,8 @@ int drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_bw_limit(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *branch, + if (drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_bw_limit(port->mstb, mst_state)) + return -ENOSPC; + +- if (port->available_pbn > 0) +- pbn_limit = port->available_pbn; ++ if (port->full_pbn > 0) ++ pbn_limit = port->full_pbn; + } + DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[MST BRANCH:%p] branch has %d PBN available\n", + branch, pbn_limit); +diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h +index bcb39da9adb4..41725d88d27e 100644 +--- a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h ++++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h +@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ struct drm_dp_vcpi { + * &drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr.base.lock. + * @num_sdp_stream_sinks: Number of stream sinks. Protected by + * &drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr.base.lock. +- * @available_pbn: Available bandwidth for this port. Protected by ++ * @full_pbn: Max possible bandwidth for this port. Protected by + * &drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr.base.lock. + * @next: link to next port on this branch device + * @aux: i2c aux transport to talk to device connected to this port, protected +@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ struct drm_dp_mst_port { + u8 dpcd_rev; + u8 num_sdp_streams; + u8 num_sdp_stream_sinks; +- uint16_t available_pbn; ++ uint16_t full_pbn; + struct list_head next; + /** + * @mstb: the branch device connected to this port, if there is one. +-- +2.25.1 + +From 6fceb6d9d9cdef2e26558f6b75700cc0f07a812c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Lyude Paul +Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 18:46:21 -0500 +Subject: [PATCH 3/4] drm/dp_mst: Reprobe path resources in CSN handler + +We used to punt off reprobing path resources to the link address probe +work, but now that we handle CSNs asynchronously from the driver's HPD +handling we can do whatever the heck we want from the CSN! + +So, reprobe the path resources from drm_dp_mst_handle_conn_stat(). Also, +get rid of the path resource reprobing code in +drm_dp_check_and_send_link_address() since it's needlessly complicated +when we already reprobe path resources from +drm_dp_handle_link_address_port(). And finally, teach +drm_dp_send_enum_path_resources() to return 1 on PBN changes so we know +if we need to send another hotplug or not. + +This fixes issues where we've indicated to userspace that a port has +just been connected, before we actually probed it's available PBN - +something that results in unexpected atomic check failures. + +Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul +Fixes: cd82d82cbc04 ("drm/dp_mst: Add branch bandwidth validation to MST atomic check") +Cc: Mikita Lipski +Cc: Hans de Goede +Cc: Sean Paul +--- + drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 48 ++++++++++++++------------- + 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +index 7df7676b45c4..112972031a84 100644 +--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c ++++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +@@ -2302,12 +2302,16 @@ drm_dp_mst_handle_link_address_port(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, + mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock); + } + +- if (old_ddps != port->ddps) { +- if (port->ddps) { +- if (!port->input) { +- drm_dp_send_enum_path_resources(mgr, mstb, +- port); +- } ++ /* ++ * Reprobe PBN caps on both hotplug, and when re-probing the link ++ * for our parent mstb ++ */ ++ if (old_ddps != port->ddps || !created) { ++ if (port->ddps && !port->input) { ++ ret = drm_dp_send_enum_path_resources(mgr, mstb, ++ port); ++ if (ret == 1) ++ changed = true; + } else { + port->full_pbn = 0; + } +@@ -2401,11 +2405,10 @@ drm_dp_mst_handle_conn_stat(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, + port->ddps = conn_stat->displayport_device_plug_status; + + if (old_ddps != port->ddps) { +- if (port->ddps) { +- dowork = true; +- } else { ++ if (port->ddps && !port->input) ++ drm_dp_send_enum_path_resources(mgr, mstb, port); ++ else + port->full_pbn = 0; +- } + } + + new_pdt = port->input ? DP_PEER_DEVICE_NONE : conn_stat->peer_device_type; +@@ -2556,13 +2559,6 @@ static int drm_dp_check_and_send_link_address(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mg + if (port->input || !port->ddps) + continue; + +- if (!port->full_pbn) { +- drm_modeset_lock(&mgr->base.lock, NULL); +- drm_dp_send_enum_path_resources(mgr, mstb, port); +- drm_modeset_unlock(&mgr->base.lock); +- changed = true; +- } +- + if (port->mstb) + mstb_child = drm_dp_mst_topology_get_mstb_validated( + mgr, port->mstb); +@@ -2990,6 +2986,7 @@ drm_dp_send_enum_path_resources(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, + + ret = drm_dp_mst_wait_tx_reply(mstb, txmsg); + if (ret > 0) { ++ ret = 0; + path_res = &txmsg->reply.u.path_resources; + + if (txmsg->reply.reply_type == DP_SIDEBAND_REPLY_NAK) { +@@ -3002,13 +2999,22 @@ drm_dp_send_enum_path_resources(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, + path_res->port_number, + path_res->full_payload_bw_number, + path_res->avail_payload_bw_number); ++ ++ /* ++ * If something changed, make sure we send a ++ * hotplug ++ */ ++ if (port->full_pbn != path_res->full_payload_bw_number || ++ port->fec_capable != path_res->fec_capable) ++ ret = 1; ++ + port->full_pbn = path_res->full_payload_bw_number; + port->fec_capable = path_res->fec_capable; + } + } + + kfree(txmsg); +- return 0; ++ return ret; + } + + static struct drm_dp_mst_port *drm_dp_get_last_connected_port_to_mstb(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb) +@@ -3595,13 +3601,9 @@ drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_invalidate_mstb(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb) + /* The link address will need to be re-sent on resume */ + mstb->link_address_sent = false; + +- list_for_each_entry(port, &mstb->ports, next) { +- /* The PBN for each port will also need to be re-probed */ +- port->full_pbn = 0; +- ++ list_for_each_entry(port, &mstb->ports, next) + if (port->mstb) + drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_invalidate_mstb(port->mstb); +- } + } + + /** +-- +2.25.1 + +From 20c8afc6f3f18187517411323a125dfff3c014e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Lyude Paul +Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 18:46:22 -0500 +Subject: [PATCH 4/4] drm/dp_mst: Rewrite and fix bandwidth limit checks +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit + +Sigh, this is mostly my fault for not giving commit cd82d82cbc04 +("drm/dp_mst: Add branch bandwidth validation to MST atomic check") +enough scrutiny during review. The way we're checking bandwidth +limitations here is mostly wrong: + +For starters, drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_bw_limit() determines the +pbn_limit of a branch by simply scanning each port on the current branch +device, then uses the last non-zero full_pbn value that it finds. It +then counts the sum of the PBN used on each branch device for that +level, and compares against the full_pbn value it found before. + +This is wrong because ports can and will have different PBN limitations +on many hubs, especially since a number of DisplayPort hubs out there +will be clever and only use the smallest link rate required for each +downstream sink - potentially giving every port a different full_pbn +value depending on what link rate it's trained at. This means with our +current code, which max PBN value we end up with is not well defined. + +Additionally, we also need to remember when checking bandwidth +limitations that the top-most device in any MST topology is a branch +device, not a port. This means that the first level of a topology +doesn't technically have a full_pbn value that needs to be checked. +Instead, we should assume that so long as our VCPI allocations fit we're +within the bandwidth limitations of the primary MSTB. + +We do however, want to check full_pbn on every port including those of +the primary MSTB. However, it's important to keep in mind that this +value represents the minimum link rate /between a port's sink or mstb, +and the mstb itself/. A quick diagram to explain: + + MSTB #1 + / \ + / \ + Port #1 Port #2 + full_pbn for Port #1 → | | ← full_pbn for Port #2 + Sink #1 MSTB #2 + | + etc... + +Note that in the above diagram, the combined PBN from all VCPI +allocations on said hub should not exceed the full_pbn value of port #2, +and the display configuration on sink #1 should not exceed the full_pbn +value of port #1. However, port #1 and port #2 can otherwise consume as +much bandwidth as they want so long as their VCPI allocations still fit. + +And finally - our current bandwidth checking code also makes the mistake +of not checking whether something is an end device or not before trying +to traverse down it. + +So, let's fix it by rewriting our bandwidth checking helpers. We split +the function into one part for handling branches which simply adds up +the total PBN on each branch and returns it, and one for checking each +port to ensure we're not going over its PBN limit. Phew. + +This should fix regressions seen, where we erroneously reject display +configurations due to thinking they're going over our bandwidth limits +when they're not. + +Changes since v1: +* Took an even closer look at how PBN limitations are supposed to be + handled, and did some experimenting with Sean Paul. Ended up rewriting + these helpers again, but this time they should actually be correct! + +Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul +Fixes: cd82d82cbc04 ("drm/dp_mst: Add branch bandwidth validation to MST atomic check") +Cc: Mikita Lipski +Cc: Sean Paul +Cc: Hans de Goede +--- + drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++------ + 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +index 112972031a84..415bd0770eab 100644 +--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c ++++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +@@ -4830,41 +4830,103 @@ static bool drm_dp_mst_port_downstream_of_branch(struct drm_dp_mst_port *port, + return false; + } + +-static inline +-int drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_bw_limit(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *branch, +- struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state) ++static int ++drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_port_bw_limit(struct drm_dp_mst_port *port, ++ struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *state); ++ ++static int ++drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_mstb_bw_limit(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, ++ struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *state) + { +- struct drm_dp_mst_port *port; + struct drm_dp_vcpi_allocation *vcpi; +- int pbn_limit = 0, pbn_used = 0; ++ struct drm_dp_mst_port *port; ++ int pbn_used = 0, ret; ++ bool found = false; + +- list_for_each_entry(port, &branch->ports, next) { +- if (port->mstb) +- if (drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_bw_limit(port->mstb, mst_state)) +- return -ENOSPC; ++ /* Check that we have at least one port in our state that's downstream ++ * of this branch, otherwise we can skip this branch ++ */ ++ list_for_each_entry(vcpi, &state->vcpis, next) { ++ if (!vcpi->pbn || ++ !drm_dp_mst_port_downstream_of_branch(vcpi->port, ++ mstb)) ++ continue; + +- if (port->full_pbn > 0) +- pbn_limit = port->full_pbn; ++ found = true; ++ break; + } +- DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[MST BRANCH:%p] branch has %d PBN available\n", +- branch, pbn_limit); ++ if (!found) ++ return 0; + +- list_for_each_entry(vcpi, &mst_state->vcpis, next) { +- if (!vcpi->pbn) +- continue; ++ if (mstb->port_parent) ++ DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[MSTB:%p] [MST PORT:%p] Checking bandwidth limits on [MSTB:%p]\n", ++ mstb->port_parent->parent, mstb->port_parent, ++ mstb); ++ else ++ DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[MSTB:%p] Checking bandwidth limits\n", ++ mstb); ++ ++ list_for_each_entry(port, &mstb->ports, next) { ++ ret = drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_port_bw_limit(port, state); ++ if (ret < 0) ++ return ret; + +- if (drm_dp_mst_port_downstream_of_branch(vcpi->port, branch)) +- pbn_used += vcpi->pbn; ++ pbn_used += ret; + } +- DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[MST BRANCH:%p] branch used %d PBN\n", +- branch, pbn_used); + +- if (pbn_used > pbn_limit) { +- DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[MST BRANCH:%p] No available bandwidth\n", +- branch); ++ return pbn_used; ++} ++ ++static int ++drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_port_bw_limit(struct drm_dp_mst_port *port, ++ struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *state) ++{ ++ struct drm_dp_vcpi_allocation *vcpi; ++ int pbn_used = 0; ++ ++ if (port->pdt == DP_PEER_DEVICE_NONE) ++ return 0; ++ ++ if (drm_dp_mst_is_end_device(port->pdt, port->mcs)) { ++ bool found = false; ++ ++ list_for_each_entry(vcpi, &state->vcpis, next) { ++ if (vcpi->port != port) ++ continue; ++ if (!vcpi->pbn) ++ return 0; ++ ++ found = true; ++ break; ++ } ++ if (!found) ++ return 0; ++ ++ /* This should never happen, as it means we tried to ++ * set a mode before querying the full_pbn ++ */ ++ if (WARN_ON(!port->full_pbn)) ++ return -EINVAL; ++ ++ pbn_used = vcpi->pbn; ++ } else { ++ pbn_used = drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_mstb_bw_limit(port->mstb, ++ state); ++ if (pbn_used <= 0) ++ return 0; ++ } ++ ++ if (pbn_used > port->full_pbn) { ++ DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[MSTB:%p] [MST PORT:%p] required PBN of %d exceeds port limit of %d\n", ++ port->parent, port, pbn_used, ++ port->full_pbn); + return -ENOSPC; + } +- return 0; ++ ++ DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[MSTB:%p] [MST PORT:%p] uses %d out of %d PBN\n", ++ port->parent, port, pbn_used, port->full_pbn); ++ ++ return pbn_used; + } + + static inline int +@@ -5062,9 +5124,15 @@ int drm_dp_mst_atomic_check(struct drm_atomic_state *state) + ret = drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_vcpi_alloc_limit(mgr, mst_state); + if (ret) + break; +- ret = drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_bw_limit(mgr->mst_primary, mst_state); +- if (ret) ++ ++ mutex_lock(&mgr->lock); ++ ret = drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_mstb_bw_limit(mgr->mst_primary, ++ mst_state); ++ mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock); ++ if (ret < 0) + break; ++ else ++ ret = 0; + } + + return ret; +-- +2.25.1 + diff --git a/iommu-WARN_TAINT-fixes.patch b/iommu-WARN_TAINT-fixes.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5cb4aa973 --- /dev/null +++ b/iommu-WARN_TAINT-fixes.patch @@ -0,0 +1,164 @@ +From 2f2265a8cbc6b43deb169c525204ea7df02e9363 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Hans de Goede +Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 13:55:02 +0100 +Subject: [PATCH 1/2] iommu/vt-d: dmar: replace WARN_TAINT with pr_warn + + add_taint + +Quoting from the comment describing the WARN functions in +include/asm-generic/bug.h: + + * WARN(), WARN_ON(), WARN_ON_ONCE, and so on can be used to report + * significant kernel issues that need prompt attention if they should ever + * appear at runtime. + * + * Do not use these macros when checking for invalid external inputs + +The (buggy) firmware tables which the dmar code was calling WARN_TAINT +for really are invalid external inputs. They are not under the kernel's +control and the issues in them cannot be fixed by a kernel update. +So logging a backtrace, which invites bug reports to be filed about this, +is not helpful. + +Some distros, e.g. Fedora, have tools watching for the kernel backtraces +logged by the WARN macros and offer the user an option to file a bug for +this when these are encountered. The WARN_TAINT in warn_invalid_dmar() ++ another iommu WARN_TAINT, addressed in another patch, have lead to over +a 100 bugs being filed this way. + +This commit replaces the WARN_TAINT("...") calls, with +pr_warn(FW_BUG "...") + add_taint(TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, ...) calls +avoiding the backtrace and thus also avoiding bug-reports being filed +about this against the kernel. + +BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564895 +Fixes: e625b4a95d50 ("iommu/vt-d: Parse ANDD records") +Fixes: fd0c8894893c ("intel-iommu: Set a more specific taint flag for invalid BI +Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org +Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede +--- + drivers/iommu/dmar.c | 11 ++++++----- + 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/dmar.c +index 071bb42bbbc5..87194a46cb0b 100644 +--- a/drivers/iommu/dmar.c ++++ b/drivers/iommu/dmar.c +@@ -440,12 +440,13 @@ static int __init dmar_parse_one_andd(struct acpi_dmar_header *header, + + /* Check for NUL termination within the designated length */ + if (strnlen(andd->device_name, header->length - 8) == header->length - 8) { +- WARN_TAINT(1, TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, ++ pr_warn(FW_BUG + "Your BIOS is broken; ANDD object name is not NUL-terminated\n" + "BIOS vendor: %s; Ver: %s; Product Version: %s\n", + dmi_get_system_info(DMI_BIOS_VENDOR), + dmi_get_system_info(DMI_BIOS_VERSION), + dmi_get_system_info(DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION)); ++ add_taint(TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK); + return -EINVAL; + } + pr_info("ANDD device: %x name: %s\n", andd->device_number, +@@ -471,14 +472,14 @@ static int dmar_parse_one_rhsa(struct acpi_dmar_header *header, void *arg) + return 0; + } + } +- WARN_TAINT( +- 1, TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, ++ pr_warn(FW_BUG + "Your BIOS is broken; RHSA refers to non-existent DMAR unit at %llx\n" + "BIOS vendor: %s; Ver: %s; Product Version: %s\n", + drhd->reg_base_addr, + dmi_get_system_info(DMI_BIOS_VENDOR), + dmi_get_system_info(DMI_BIOS_VERSION), + dmi_get_system_info(DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION)); ++ add_taint(TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK); + + return 0; + } +@@ -827,14 +828,14 @@ int __init dmar_table_init(void) + + static void warn_invalid_dmar(u64 addr, const char *message) + { +- WARN_TAINT_ONCE( +- 1, TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, ++ pr_warn_once(FW_BUG + "Your BIOS is broken; DMAR reported at address %llx%s!\n" + "BIOS vendor: %s; Ver: %s; Product Version: %s\n", + addr, message, + dmi_get_system_info(DMI_BIOS_VENDOR), + dmi_get_system_info(DMI_BIOS_VERSION), + dmi_get_system_info(DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION)); ++ add_taint(TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK); + } + + static int __ref +-- +2.25.1 + +From 038ebd8952c5fb3ba3b5e09b0b55a4e617ae22bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Hans de Goede +Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 14:12:37 +0100 +Subject: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/vt-d: dmar_parse_one_rmrr: replace WARN_TAINT with + pr_warn + add_taint + +Quoting from the comment describing the WARN functions in +include/asm-generic/bug.h: + + * WARN(), WARN_ON(), WARN_ON_ONCE, and so on can be used to report + * significant kernel issues that need prompt attention if they should ever + * appear at runtime. + * + * Do not use these macros when checking for invalid external inputs + +The (buggy) firmware tables which the dmar code was calling WARN_TAINT +for really are invalid external inputs. They are not under the kernel's +control and the issues in them cannot be fixed by a kernel update. +So logging a backtrace, which invites bug reports to be filed about this, +is not helpful. + +Some distros, e.g. Fedora, have tools watching for the kernel backtraces +logged by the WARN macros and offer the user an option to file a bug for +this when these are encountered. The WARN_TAINT in dmar_parse_one_rmrr ++ another iommu WARN_TAINT, addressed in another patch, have lead to over +a 100 bugs being filed this way. + +This commit replaces the WARN_TAINT("...") call, with a +pr_warn(FW_BUG "...") + add_taint(TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, ...) call +avoiding the backtrace and thus also avoiding bug-reports being filed +about this against the kernel. + +BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808874 +Fixes: f5a68bb0752e ("iommu/vt-d: Mark firmware tainted if RMRR fails sanity check") +Cc: Barret Rhoden +Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org +Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede +--- + drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 6 ++++-- + 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c +index 6fa6de2b6ad5..3857a5cd1a75 100644 +--- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c ++++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c +@@ -4460,14 +4460,16 @@ int __init dmar_parse_one_rmrr(struct acpi_dmar_header *header, void *arg) + struct dmar_rmrr_unit *rmrru; + + rmrr = (struct acpi_dmar_reserved_memory *)header; +- if (rmrr_sanity_check(rmrr)) +- WARN_TAINT(1, TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, ++ if (rmrr_sanity_check(rmrr)) { ++ pr_warn(FW_BUG + "Your BIOS is broken; bad RMRR [%#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n" + "BIOS vendor: %s; Ver: %s; Product Version: %s\n", + rmrr->base_address, rmrr->end_address, + dmi_get_system_info(DMI_BIOS_VENDOR), + dmi_get_system_info(DMI_BIOS_VERSION), + dmi_get_system_info(DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION)); ++ add_taint(TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK); ++ } + + rmrru = kzalloc(sizeof(*rmrru), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!rmrru) +-- +2.25.1 + diff --git a/kernel.spec b/kernel.spec index 4f68ea776..aa807220b 100644 --- a/kernel.spec +++ b/kernel.spec @@ -879,6 +879,17 @@ Patch504: 0001-mm-kmemleak-skip-late_init-if-not-skip-disable.patch # https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/29/1772 Patch505: ARM-fix-__get_user_check-in-case-uaccess_-calls-are-not-inlined.patch +# Fix issues with only 1 monitor working on DP-MST docks (rhbz#1809681) +# These patches should show up in a future 5.6-rc# release +Patch506: drm-dp-mst-fixes.patch + +# More DP-MST fixes, pending for 5.7 +Patch507: drm-dp-mst-error-handling-improvements.patch + +# Fix backtraces triggered by warnings about buggy BIOS (rhbz 1564895, 1808874) +# Submitted upstream +Patch508: iommu-WARN_TAINT-fixes.patch + # END OF PATCH DEFINITIONS %endif @@ -2952,6 +2963,12 @@ fi # # %changelog +* Mon Mar 09 2020 Hans de Goede +- Fix only 1 monitor working on DP-MST docking stations (rhbz 1809681) +- Fix backtraces on various buggy BIOS-es (rhbz 1564895, 1808874) +- Add /etc/modprobe.d/floppy-blacklist.conf to fix auto-loading of the + legacy floppy driver (rhbz 1789155) + * Mon Mar 09 2020 Peter Robinson - 5.6.0-0.rc5.git0.1 - Linux v5.6-rc5 diff --git a/mod-extra-blacklist.sh b/mod-extra-blacklist.sh index 9569ef6f2..c4c4f8f6d 100755 --- a/mod-extra-blacklist.sh +++ b/mod-extra-blacklist.sh @@ -46,3 +46,11 @@ foreachp() [ -d "$buildroot/etc/modprobe.d/" ] || mkdir -p "$buildroot/etc/modprobe.d/" find "$buildroot/$kernel_base/extra" -name "*.ko*" | \ foreachp check_blacklist + +# Many BIOS-es export a PNP-id which causes the floppy driver to autoload +# even though most modern systems don't have a 3.5" floppy driver anymore +# this replaces the old die_floppy_die.patch which removed the PNP-id from +# the module +if [ -f $buildroot/$kernel_base/extra/drivers/block/floppy.ko* ]; then + blacklist "floppy" +fi