rpms
/
java-latest-openjdk-portable
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Bootstrap using JDK 21 

Signed-off-by: David Abdurachmanov <davidlt@rivosinc.com>
This commit is contained in:
David Abdurachmanov 2024-03-13 09:25:01 +02:00
parent c1bf21ca03
commit 78e51fa769
Signed by: davidlt
GPG Key ID: 7A5F42FAF91FACC3
1 changed files with 5 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
java-latest-openjdk-portable.spec
View File

@ -342,7 +342,7 @@
# buildjdkver is usually same as %%{featurever},
# but in time of bootstrap of next jdk, it is featurever-1,
# and this it is better to change it here, on single place
%global buildjdkver 22
%global buildjdkver 21
# We don't add any LTS designator for STS packages (Fedora and EPEL).
# We need to explicitly exclude EPEL as it would have the %%{rhel} macro defined.
%if 0%{?rhel} && !0%{?epel}
@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ Version: %{newjavaver}.%{buildver}
# This package needs `.rolling` as part of Release so as to not conflict on install with
# java-X-openjdk. I.e. when latest rolling release is also an LTS release packaged as
# java-X-openjdk. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647298
Release: %{?eaprefix}%{rpmrelease}%{?extraver}.rolling.0.riscv64%{?dist}
Release: %{?eaprefix}%{rpmrelease}%{?extraver}.rolling.1.riscv64%{?dist}
# java-1.5.0-ibm from jpackage.org set Epoch to 1 for unknown reasons
# and this change was brought into RHEL-4. java-1.5.0-ibm packages
# also included the epoch in their virtual provides. This created a
@ -1784,6 +1784,9 @@ done
%endif
%changelog
* Wed Mar 13 2024 David Abdurachmanov <davidlt@rivosinc.com> - 1:22.0.0.0.36-3.rolling.1.riscv64
- Bootstrap using JDK 21
* Tue Mar 12 2024 David Abdurachmanov <davidlt@rivosinc.com> - 1:22.0.0.0.36-3.rolling.0.riscv64
- Expand riscv64 configuration