Re-enable gdb backtrace check on formerly disabled arches.
This commit is contained in:
parent
487c5b54b4
commit
0bb7626ce6
@ -136,13 +136,8 @@
|
||||
%global ssbd_arches x86_64
|
||||
# Set of architectures for which java has short vector math library (libsvml.so)
|
||||
%global svml_arches x86_64
|
||||
# Set of architectures where we verify backtraces with gdb (ideally all)
|
||||
# Temporarily disable check on x86, x86_64, ppc64le and s390x as gdb crashes
|
||||
# ../../gdb/objfiles.h:510: internal-error: sect_index_data not initialized
|
||||
# A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
|
||||
# further debugging may prove unreliable.
|
||||
# See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041970
|
||||
%global gdb_arches sparcv9 sparc64 %{aarch64} %{arm} %{zero_arches}
|
||||
# Set of architectures where we verify backtraces with gdb
|
||||
%global gdb_arches %{jit_arches} %{zero_arches}
|
||||
|
||||
# By default, we build a debug build during main build on JIT architectures
|
||||
%if %{with slowdebug}
|
||||
@ -339,7 +334,7 @@
|
||||
%global top_level_dir_name %{origin}
|
||||
%global top_level_dir_name_backup %{top_level_dir_name}-backup
|
||||
%global buildver 8
|
||||
%global rpmrelease 3
|
||||
%global rpmrelease 4
|
||||
# Priority must be 8 digits in total; up to openjdk 1.8, we were using 18..... so when we moved to 11, we had to add another digit
|
||||
%if %is_system_jdk
|
||||
# Using 10 digits may overflow the int used for priority, so we combine the patch and build versions
|
||||
@ -2533,6 +2528,10 @@ cjc.mainProgram(args)
|
||||
%endif
|
||||
|
||||
%changelog
|
||||
* Mon Feb 07 2022 Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf@redhat.com> - 1:17.0.2.0.8-4
|
||||
- Re-enable gdb backtrace check.
|
||||
- Resolves RHBZ#2041970
|
||||
|
||||
* Fri Feb 04 2022 Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew@redhat.com> - 1:17.0.2.0.8-3
|
||||
- Temporarily move x86 to use Zero in order to get a working build
|
||||
- Replace -mstackrealign with -mincoming-stack-boundary=2 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=4 on x86_32 for stack alignment
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user