rpms
/
java-21-openjdk-portable
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Added slave for jfr in devel

This commit is contained in:
pmikova 2019-04-04 11:23:11 +02:00
parent a1e75b717d
commit 30796d51fa
1 changed files with 5 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
java-latest-openjdk.spec
View File

@ -409,6 +409,7 @@ alternatives \\
--slave %{_bindir}/jdb jdb %{sdkbindir -- %{?1}}/jdb \\
--slave %{_bindir}/jdeps jdeps %{sdkbindir -- %{?1}}/jdeps \\
--slave %{_bindir}/jdeprscan jdeprscan %{sdkbindir -- %{?1}}/jdeprscan \\
--slave %{_bindir}/jfr jfr %{sdkbindir -- %{?1}}/jfr \\
--slave %{_bindir}/jimage jimage %{sdkbindir -- %{?1}}/jimage \\
--slave %{_bindir}/jinfo jinfo %{sdkbindir -- %{?1}}/jinfo \\
--slave %{_bindir}/jmap jmap %{sdkbindir -- %{?1}}/jmap \\
@ -944,7 +945,7 @@ Version: %{newjavaver}.%{buildver}
# This package needs `.rolling` as part of Release so as to not conflict on install with
# java-X-openjdk. I.e. when latest rolling release is also an LTS release packaged as
# java-X-openjdk. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647298
Release: 3.rolling%{?dist}
Release: 4.rolling%{?dist}
# java-1.5.0-ibm from jpackage.org set Epoch to 1 for unknown reasons
# and this change was brought into RHEL-4. java-1.5.0-ibm packages
# also included the epoch in their virtual provides. This created a
@ -1818,6 +1819,9 @@ require "copy_jdk_configs.lua"
%changelog
* Thu Apr 04 2019 Petra Mikova <pmikova@redhat.com - 1:12.0.0.33-4.rolling
- added slave for jfr binary in devel package
* Thu Mar 21 2019 Petra Mikova <pmikova@redhat.com - 1:12.0.0.33-3.rolling
- Replaced pcsc-lite-devel (which is in optional channel) with pcsc-lite-libs.
- added rh1684077-openjdk_should_depend_on_pcsc-lite-libs_instead_of_pcsc-lite-devel.patch to make jdk work with pcsc