ghc/add_-latomic_to_ghc-prim.patch

55 lines
2.0 KiB
Diff

commit ce3897ffd6e7c8b8f36b8e920168bac8c7f836ae
Author: Ilias Tsitsimpis <iliastsi@debian.org>
Date: Tue Sep 18 17:45:17 2018 +0200
Fix check whether GCC supports __atomic_ builtins
Summary:
C11 atomics are never used because:
* The program used for checking whether GCC supports
__atomic_ builtins fails with the following error:
```
error: size mismatch in argument 2 of `__atomic_load`
int test(int *x) { int y; __atomic_load(&x, &y, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST); return x; }
```
* There is a typo when checking if CONF_GCC_SUPPORTS__ATOMICS equals YES,
resulting in PRIM_CFLAGS and PRIM_EXTRA_LIBRARIES never being set.
Reviewers: bgamari
Reviewed By: bgamari
Subscribers: rwbarton, erikd, carter
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D5154
Index: b/libraries/ghc-prim/aclocal.m4
===================================================================
--- a/libraries/ghc-prim/aclocal.m4
+++ b/libraries/ghc-prim/aclocal.m4
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ AC_DEFUN([FP_GCC_SUPPORTS__ATOMICS],
[
AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_CC])
AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether GCC supports __atomic_ builtins])
- echo 'int test(int *x) { int y; __atomic_load(&x, &y, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST); return x; }' > conftest.c
+ echo 'int test(int *x) { int y; __atomic_load(x, &y, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST); return y; }' > conftest.c
if $CC -c conftest.c > /dev/null 2>&1; then
CONF_GCC_SUPPORTS__ATOMICS=YES
AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])
Index: b/libraries/ghc-prim/configure.ac
===================================================================
--- a/libraries/ghc-prim/configure.ac
+++ b/libraries/ghc-prim/configure.ac
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ dnl unregisterised, Sparc, and PPC ba
FP_GCC_SUPPORTS__ATOMICS
AC_DEFINE([HAVE_C11_ATOMICS], [$CONF_GCC_SUPPORTS__ATOMICS], [Does GCC support __atomic primitives?])
-if test "x$CONF_GCC_SUPPORTS__ATOMICS" = YES
+if test "$CONF_GCC_SUPPORTS__ATOMICS" = "YES"
then PRIM_CFLAGS=-DHAVE_C11_ATOMICS
PRIM_EXTRA_LIBRARIES=atomic
fi