gdb/gdb-upstream.patch

242 lines
8.5 KiB
Diff

commit 7a270e0c9ba0eb738a4c30258ab29c09963fcd4d
Author: Alexander Klimov <alserkli@inbox.ru>
Date: Tue Jan 27 19:56:45 2015 +0200
Fix build failure in symfile.c::unmap_overlay_command (GCC5 bug)
Compilation of (GDB) 7.9.50.20150127-cvs with (GCC) 5.0.0 20150127
fails with
In file included from symfile.c:32:0:
symfile.c: In function 'unmap_overlay_command':
objfiles.h:628:3: error: 'sec' may be used uninitialized in this
function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
for (osect = objfile->sections; osect < objfile->sections_end; osect++) \
^
symfile.c:3442:23: note: 'sec' was declared here
struct obj_section *sec;
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [symfile.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `gdb/gdb'
While the bug was reported to GCC as
<https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64823>,
the attached patch simply initializes sec with NULL.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* symfile.c (unmap_overlay_command): Initialize sec to NULL.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
### a/gdb/ChangeLog
### b/gdb/ChangeLog
## -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2015-01-29 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> (tiny patch)
+
+ * symfile.c (unmap_overlay_command): Initialize sec to NULL.
+
2015-01-27 Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
* NEWS: Mention gdb.Objfile.username.
--- a/gdb/symfile.c
+++ b/gdb/symfile.c
@@ -3439,7 +3439,7 @@ static void
unmap_overlay_command (char *args, int from_tty)
{
struct objfile *objfile;
- struct obj_section *sec;
+ struct obj_section *sec = NULL;
if (!overlay_debugging)
error (_("Overlay debugging not enabled. "
commit 253828f102691732d014e8f1d62f9b5dc779b39c
Author: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Jan 22 21:04:53 2015 +0100
Sort threads for thread apply all
downstream Fedora request:
Please make it easier to find the backtrace of the crashing thread
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024504
Currently after loading a core file GDB prints:
Core was generated by `./threadcrash1'.
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
8 *(volatile int *)0=0;
(gdb) _
there is nowhere seen which of the threads had crashed. In reality GDB always
numbers that thread as #1 and it is the current thread that time. But after
dumping all the info into a file for later analysis it is no longer obvious.
'thread apply all bt' even puts the thread #1 to the _end_ of the output!!!
I find maybe as good enough and with no risk of UI change flamewar to just
sort the threads by their number. Currently they are printed as they happen
in the internal GDB list which has no advantage. Printing thread #1 as the
first one with assumed 'thread apply all bt' (after the core file is loaded)
should make the complaint resolved I guess.
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:29:07 +0100, Doug Evans wrote:
No objection to sorting the list, but if thread #1 is the important one,
then a concern could be it'll have scrolled off the screen (such a
concern has been voiced in another thread in another context),
and if not lost (say it's in an emacs buffer) one would still have
to scroll back to see it.
So one *could* still want #1 to be last.
Do we want an option to choose the sort direction?
gdb/ChangeLog
2015-01-22 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* NEWS (Changes since GDB 7.9): Add 'thread apply all' option
'-ascending'.
* thread.c (tp_array_compar_ascending, tp_array_compar): New.
(thread_apply_all_command): Parse CMD for tp_array_compar_ascending.
Sort tp_array using tp_array_compar.
(_initialize_thread): Extend thread_apply_all_command help.
gdb/doc/ChangeLog
2015-01-22 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* gdb.texinfo (Threads): Describe -ascending for thread apply all.
### a/gdb/ChangeLog
### b/gdb/ChangeLog
## -1,5 +1,14 @@
2015-01-22 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
+ * NEWS (Changes since GDB 7.9): Add 'thread apply all' option
+ '-ascending'.
+ * thread.c (tp_array_compar_ascending, tp_array_compar): New.
+ (thread_apply_all_command): Parse CMD for tp_array_compar_ascending.
+ Sort tp_array using tp_array_compar.
+ (_initialize_thread): Extend thread_apply_all_command help.
+
+2015-01-22 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
+
* corelow.c (core_open): Call also thread_command.
* gdbthread.h (thread_command): New prototype moved from ...
* thread.c (thread_command): ... here.
--- gdb-7.9.1/gdb/NEWS.orig 2015-06-19 15:45:57.614937084 +0200
+++ gdb-7.9.1/gdb/NEWS 2015-06-19 15:46:26.352104210 +0200
@@ -1,6 +1,13 @@
What has changed in GDB?
(Organized release by release)
+*** Changes since GDB 7.9.1
+
+* New options
+
+* The command 'thread apply all' can now support new option '-ascending'
+ to call its specified command for all threads in ascending order.
+
*** Changes in GDB 7.9.1
* Python Scripting
### a/gdb/doc/ChangeLog
### b/gdb/doc/ChangeLog
## -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2015-01-22 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
+
+ * gdb.texinfo (Threads): Describe -ascending for thread apply all.
+
2015-01-16 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
* doc/gdb.texinfo (TUI Commands): Document the possible
--- a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
+++ b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
@@ -2959,14 +2959,17 @@ information on convenience variables.
@kindex thread apply
@cindex apply command to several threads
-@item thread apply [@var{threadno} | all] @var{command}
+@item thread apply [@var{threadno} | all [-ascending]] @var{command}
The @code{thread apply} command allows you to apply the named
@var{command} to one or more threads. Specify the numbers of the
threads that you want affected with the command argument
@var{threadno}. It can be a single thread number, one of the numbers
shown in the first field of the @samp{info threads} display; or it
-could be a range of thread numbers, as in @code{2-4}. To apply a
-command to all threads, type @kbd{thread apply all @var{command}}.
+could be a range of thread numbers, as in @code{2-4}. To apply
+a command to all threads in descending order, type @kbd{thread apply all
+@var{command}}. To apply a command to all threads in ascending order,
+type @kbd{thread apply all -ascending @var{command}}.
+
@kindex thread name
@cindex name a thread
--- a/gdb/thread.c
+++ b/gdb/thread.c
@@ -1381,6 +1381,24 @@ make_cleanup_restore_current_thread (void)
restore_current_thread_cleanup_dtor);
}
+/* If non-zero tp_array_compar should sort in ascending order, otherwise in
+ descending order. */
+
+static int tp_array_compar_ascending;
+
+/* Sort an array for struct thread_info pointers by their NUM, order is
+ determined by TP_ARRAY_COMPAR_ASCENDING. */
+
+static int
+tp_array_compar (const void *ap_voidp, const void *bp_voidp)
+{
+ const struct thread_info *const *ap = ap_voidp;
+ const struct thread_info *const *bp = bp_voidp;
+
+ return ((((*ap)->num > (*bp)->num) - ((*ap)->num < (*bp)->num))
+ * (tp_array_compar_ascending ? +1 : -1));
+}
+
/* Apply a GDB command to a list of threads. List syntax is a whitespace
seperated list of numbers, or ranges, or the keyword `all'. Ranges consist
of two numbers seperated by a hyphen. Examples:
@@ -1397,6 +1415,14 @@ thread_apply_all_command (char *cmd, int from_tty)
int tc;
struct thread_array_cleanup ta_cleanup;
+ tp_array_compar_ascending = 0;
+ if (cmd != NULL
+ && check_for_argument (&cmd, "-ascending", strlen ("-ascending")))
+ {
+ cmd = skip_spaces (cmd);
+ tp_array_compar_ascending = 1;
+ }
+
if (cmd == NULL || *cmd == '\000')
error (_("Please specify a command following the thread ID list"));
@@ -1430,6 +1456,8 @@ thread_apply_all_command (char *cmd, int from_tty)
i++;
}
+ qsort (tp_array, i, sizeof (*tp_array), tp_array_compar);
+
make_cleanup (set_thread_refcount, &ta_cleanup);
for (k = 0; k != i; k++)
@@ -1738,7 +1766,14 @@ The new thread ID must be currently known."),
&thread_apply_list, "thread apply ", 1, &thread_cmd_list);
add_cmd ("all", class_run, thread_apply_all_command,
- _("Apply a command to all threads."), &thread_apply_list);
+ _("\
+Apply a command to all threads.\n\
+\n\
+Usage: thread apply all [-ascending] <command>\n\
+-ascending: Call <command> for all threads in ascending order.\n\
+ The default is descending order.\
+"),
+ &thread_apply_list);
add_cmd ("name", class_run, thread_name_command,
_("Set the current thread's name.\n\