gdb/gdb-6.6-scheduler_locking-s...

203 lines
7.8 KiB
Diff

2007-06-25 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* inferior.h (enum resume_step): New definition.
(resume): Change STEP parameter type to ENUM RESUME_STEP.
* infrun.c (resume): Likewise. Extend debug printing of the STEP
parameter. Lock the scheduler only for intentional stepping.
(proceed): Replace the variable ONESTEP with tristate RESUME_STEP.
Set the third RESUME_STEP state according to BPSTAT_SHOULD_STEP.
(currently_stepping): Change the return type to ENUM RESUME_STEP.
Return RESUME_STEP_NEEDED if it is just due to BPSTAT_SHOULD_STEP.
* linux-nat.c (select_singlestep_lwp_callback): Do not focus on
the software watchpoint events.
* linux-nat.h (struct lwp_info): Redeclare STEP as ENUM RESUME_STEP.
2007-10-19 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* infrun.c (proceed): RESUME_STEP initialized for non-stepping.
RESUME_STEP set according to STEP only at the end of the function.
2008-02-24 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Port to GDB-6.8pre.
Index: gdb-6.8.50.20081209/gdb/inferior.h
===================================================================
--- gdb-6.8.50.20081209.orig/gdb/inferior.h 2008-11-20 01:35:23.000000000 +0100
+++ gdb-6.8.50.20081209/gdb/inferior.h 2008-12-10 01:22:23.000000000 +0100
@@ -168,7 +168,15 @@ extern void reopen_exec_file (void);
/* The `resume' routine should only be called in special circumstances.
Normally, use `proceed', which handles a lot of bookkeeping. */
-extern void resume (int, enum target_signal);
+enum resume_step
+ {
+ /* currently_stepping () should return non-zero for non-continue. */
+ RESUME_STEP_CONTINUE = 0,
+ RESUME_STEP_USER, /* Stepping is intentional by the user. */
+ RESUME_STEP_NEEDED /* Stepping only for software watchpoints. */
+ };
+
+extern void resume (enum resume_step, enum target_signal);
/* From misc files */
Index: gdb-6.8.50.20081209/gdb/infrun.c
===================================================================
--- gdb-6.8.50.20081209.orig/gdb/infrun.c 2008-12-02 20:20:23.000000000 +0100
+++ gdb-6.8.50.20081209/gdb/infrun.c 2008-12-10 01:23:46.000000000 +0100
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static int follow_fork (void);
static void set_schedlock_func (char *args, int from_tty,
struct cmd_list_element *c);
-static int currently_stepping (struct thread_info *tp);
+static enum resume_step currently_stepping (struct thread_info *tp);
static int currently_stepping_callback (struct thread_info *tp, void *data);
@@ -961,7 +961,7 @@ set_schedlock_func (char *args, int from
STEP nonzero if we should step (zero to continue instead).
SIG is the signal to give the inferior (zero for none). */
void
-resume (int step, enum target_signal sig)
+resume (enum resume_step step, enum target_signal sig)
{
int should_resume = 1;
struct cleanup *old_cleanups = make_cleanup (resume_cleanups, 0);
@@ -975,10 +975,12 @@ resume (int step, enum target_signal sig
QUIT;
if (debug_infrun)
- fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
- "infrun: resume (step=%d, signal=%d), "
- "trap_expected=%d\n",
- step, sig, tp->trap_expected);
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "infrun: resume (step=%s, signal=%d), "
+ "trap_expected=%d\n",
+ (step == RESUME_STEP_CONTINUE ? "RESUME_STEP_CONTINUE"
+ : (step == RESUME_STEP_USER ? "RESUME_STEP_USER"
+ : "RESUME_STEP_NEEDED")),
+ sig, tp->trap_expected);
/* Some targets (e.g. Solaris x86) have a kernel bug when stepping
over an instruction that causes a page fault without triggering
@@ -1127,9 +1129,10 @@ a command like `return' or `jump' to con
individually. */
resume_ptid = inferior_ptid;
}
- else if ((scheduler_mode == schedlock_on)
+ else if (scheduler_mode == schedlock_on
|| (scheduler_mode == schedlock_step
- && (step || singlestep_breakpoints_inserted_p)))
+ && (step == RESUME_STEP_USER
+ || singlestep_breakpoints_inserted_p)))
{
/* User-settable 'scheduler' mode requires solo thread resume. */
resume_ptid = inferior_ptid;
@@ -1302,7 +1305,7 @@ proceed (CORE_ADDR addr, enum target_sig
struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_regcache_arch (regcache);
struct thread_info *tp;
CORE_ADDR pc = regcache_read_pc (regcache);
- int oneproc = 0;
+ enum resume_step resume_step = RESUME_STEP_CONTINUE;
if (step > 0)
step_start_function = find_pc_function (pc);
@@ -1322,13 +1325,13 @@ proceed (CORE_ADDR addr, enum target_sig
actually be executing the breakpoint insn anyway.
We'll be (un-)executing the previous instruction. */
- oneproc = 1;
+ resume_step = RESUME_STEP_USER;
else if (gdbarch_single_step_through_delay_p (gdbarch)
&& gdbarch_single_step_through_delay (gdbarch,
get_current_frame ()))
/* We stepped onto an instruction that needs to be stepped
again before re-inserting the breakpoint, do so. */
- oneproc = 1;
+ resume_step = RESUME_STEP_USER;
}
else
{
@@ -1359,13 +1362,13 @@ proceed (CORE_ADDR addr, enum target_sig
is required it returns TRUE and sets the current thread to
the old thread. */
if (prepare_to_proceed (step))
- oneproc = 1;
+ resume_step = RESUME_STEP_USER;
}
/* prepare_to_proceed may change the current thread. */
tp = inferior_thread ();
- if (oneproc)
+ if (resume_step == RESUME_STEP_USER)
{
tp->trap_expected = 1;
/* If displaced stepping is enabled, we can step over the
@@ -1451,8 +1454,13 @@ proceed (CORE_ADDR addr, enum target_sig
/* Reset to normal state. */
init_infwait_state ();
+ if (step)
+ resume_step = RESUME_STEP_USER;
+ if (resume_step == RESUME_STEP_CONTINUE && bpstat_should_step ())
+ resume_step = RESUME_STEP_NEEDED;
+
/* Resume inferior. */
- resume (oneproc || step || bpstat_should_step (), tp->stop_signal);
+ resume (resume_step, tp->stop_signal);
/* Wait for it to stop (if not standalone)
and in any case decode why it stopped, and act accordingly. */
@@ -3690,10 +3698,16 @@ currently_stepping_callback (struct thre
return tp != data && currently_stepping_thread (tp);
}
-static int
+static enum resume_step
currently_stepping (struct thread_info *tp)
{
- return currently_stepping_thread (tp) || bpstat_should_step ();
+ if (currently_stepping_thread (tp))
+ return RESUME_STEP_USER;
+
+ if (bpstat_should_step ())
+ return RESUME_STEP_NEEDED;
+
+ return RESUME_STEP_CONTINUE;
}
/* Inferior has stepped into a subroutine call with source code that
Index: gdb-6.8.50.20081209/gdb/linux-nat.c
===================================================================
--- gdb-6.8.50.20081209.orig/gdb/linux-nat.c 2008-12-02 08:57:36.000000000 +0100
+++ gdb-6.8.50.20081209/gdb/linux-nat.c 2008-12-10 01:22:23.000000000 +0100
@@ -2343,7 +2343,10 @@ count_events_callback (struct lwp_info *
static int
select_singlestep_lwp_callback (struct lwp_info *lp, void *data)
{
- if (lp->step && lp->status != 0)
+ /* We do not focus on software watchpoints as we would not catch
+ STEPPING_PAST_SINGLESTEP_BREAKPOINT breakpoints in some other thread
+ as they would remain pending due to `Push back breakpoint for %s'. */
+ if (lp->step == RESUME_STEP_USER && lp->status != 0)
return 1;
else
return 0;
Index: gdb-6.8.50.20081209/gdb/linux-nat.h
===================================================================
--- gdb-6.8.50.20081209.orig/gdb/linux-nat.h 2008-07-27 23:12:40.000000000 +0200
+++ gdb-6.8.50.20081209/gdb/linux-nat.h 2008-12-10 01:22:23.000000000 +0100
@@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ struct lwp_info
/* If non-zero, a pending wait status. */
int status;
- /* Non-zero if we were stepping this LWP. */
- int step;
+ /* The kind of stepping of this LWP. */
+ enum resume_step step;
/* Non-zero si_signo if this LWP stopped with a trap. si_addr may
be the address of a hardware watchpoint. */