- dont apply gdb-bz539590-gnu-ifunc.patch on sparc
- we dont yet have the support in glibc
This commit is contained in:
parent
4b77e42af7
commit
1d79a59635
12
gdb.spec
12
gdb.spec
|
@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Version: 7.0.1
|
|||
|
||||
# The release always contains a leading reserved number, start it at 1.
|
||||
# `upstream' is not a part of `name' to stay fully rpm dependencies compatible for the testing.
|
||||
Release: 35%{?_with_upstream:.upstream}%{dist}
|
||||
Release: 35%{?_with_upstream:.upstream}%{dist}.1
|
||||
|
||||
License: GPLv3+
|
||||
Group: Development/Debuggers
|
||||
|
@ -400,8 +400,12 @@ Patch383: gdb-bz528668-symfile-sepcrc.patch
|
|||
Patch384: gdb-bz528668-symfile-cleanup.patch
|
||||
Patch385: gdb-bz528668-symfile-multi.patch
|
||||
|
||||
# sparc glibc does not support ifunc patches have been sent upstream adding
|
||||
# they are not in any fedora sparc build
|
||||
%ifnarch %{sparc}
|
||||
# Support GNU IFUNCs - indirect functions (BZ 539590).
|
||||
Patch387: gdb-bz539590-gnu-ifunc.patch
|
||||
%endif
|
||||
|
||||
# Fix bp conditionals [bp_location-accel] regression (BZ 538626).
|
||||
Patch388: gdb-bz538626-bp_location-accel-bp-cond.patch
|
||||
|
@ -723,7 +727,9 @@ rm -f gdb/jv-exp.c gdb/m2-exp.c gdb/objc-exp.c gdb/p-exp.c
|
|||
%patch376 -p1
|
||||
%patch381 -p1
|
||||
%patch382 -p1
|
||||
%ifnarch %{sparc}
|
||||
%patch387 -p1
|
||||
%endif
|
||||
%patch389 -p1
|
||||
%patch390 -p1
|
||||
%patch391 -p1
|
||||
|
@ -1075,6 +1081,10 @@ fi
|
|||
%endif
|
||||
|
||||
%changelog
|
||||
* Fri Mar 26 2010 Dennis Gilmore <dennis@ausil.us> - 7.0.1-35.1
|
||||
- dont apply gdb-bz539590-gnu-ifunc.patch on sparc
|
||||
- we dont yet have the support in glibc
|
||||
|
||||
* Mon Mar 15 2010 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> - 7.0.1-35.fc12
|
||||
- Drop gdb-6.5-bz218379-ppc-solib-trampoline-fix.patch having false symbols
|
||||
resolving (related to BZ 573277).
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue