gcc/gcc6-pr10200-revert.patch

105 lines
4.6 KiB
Diff

Revert due to PR69753:
2016-02-10 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
PR c++/10200
* parser.c (cp_parser_lookup_name): When looking for a template
after . or ->, only consider class templates.
(cp_parser_postfix_dot_deref_expression): Handle the current
instantiation. Remember a dependent object expression.
* typeck2.c (build_x_arrow): Handle the current instantiation.
--- gcc/cp/typeck2.c (revision 233277)
+++ gcc/cp/typeck2.c (revision 233276)
@@ -1694,10 +1694,7 @@ build_x_arrow (location_t loc, tree expr
if (processing_template_decl)
{
- if (type && TREE_CODE (type) == POINTER_TYPE
- && !dependent_scope_p (TREE_TYPE (type)))
- /* Pointer to current instantiation, don't treat as dependent. */;
- else if (type_dependent_expression_p (expr))
+ if (type_dependent_expression_p (expr))
return build_min_nt_loc (loc, ARROW_EXPR, expr);
expr = build_non_dependent_expr (expr);
}
--- gcc/cp/parser.c (revision 233277)
+++ gcc/cp/parser.c (revision 233276)
@@ -7184,16 +7184,8 @@ cp_parser_postfix_dot_deref_expression (
if (token_type == CPP_DEREF)
postfix_expression = build_x_arrow (location, postfix_expression,
tf_warning_or_error);
- /* According to the standard, no expression should ever have
- reference type. Unfortunately, we do not currently match
- the standard in this respect in that our internal representation
- of an expression may have reference type even when the standard
- says it does not. Therefore, we have to manually obtain the
- underlying type here. */
- scope = non_reference (TREE_TYPE (postfix_expression));
- /* Check to see whether or not the expression is type-dependent and
- not the current instantiation. */
- dependent_p = !scope || dependent_scope_p (scope);
+ /* Check to see whether or not the expression is type-dependent. */
+ dependent_p = type_dependent_expression_p (postfix_expression);
/* The identifier following the `->' or `.' is not qualified. */
parser->scope = NULL_TREE;
parser->qualifying_scope = NULL_TREE;
@@ -7202,8 +7194,16 @@ cp_parser_postfix_dot_deref_expression (
/* Enter the scope corresponding to the type of the object
given by the POSTFIX_EXPRESSION. */
- if (!dependent_p)
+ if (!dependent_p && TREE_TYPE (postfix_expression) != NULL_TREE)
{
+ scope = TREE_TYPE (postfix_expression);
+ /* According to the standard, no expression should ever have
+ reference type. Unfortunately, we do not currently match
+ the standard in this respect in that our internal representation
+ of an expression may have reference type even when the standard
+ says it does not. Therefore, we have to manually obtain the
+ underlying type here. */
+ scope = non_reference (scope);
/* The type of the POSTFIX_EXPRESSION must be complete. */
if (scope == unknown_type_node)
{
@@ -7215,10 +7215,7 @@ cp_parser_postfix_dot_deref_expression (
required to be of complete type for purposes of class member
access (5.2.5) outside the member function body. */
else if (postfix_expression != current_class_ref
- && !(processing_template_decl
- && current_class_type
- && (same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p
- (scope, current_class_type))))
+ && !(processing_template_decl && scope == current_class_type))
scope = complete_type_or_else (scope, NULL_TREE);
/* Let the name lookup machinery know that we are processing a
class member access expression. */
@@ -7234,10 +7231,6 @@ cp_parser_postfix_dot_deref_expression (
if (scope == error_mark_node)
postfix_expression = error_mark_node;
}
- else
- /* Tell cp_parser_lookup_name that there was an object, even though it's
- type-dependent. */
- parser->context->object_type = unknown_type_node;
/* Assume this expression is not a pseudo-destructor access. */
pseudo_destructor_p = false;
@@ -24727,15 +24720,10 @@ cp_parser_lookup_name (cp_parser *parser
decl = NULL_TREE;
if (!decl)
- /* Look it up in the enclosing context. DR 141: When looking for a
- template-name after -> or ., only consider class templates. */
- decl = lookup_name_real (name, tag_type != none_type || is_template,
+ /* Look it up in the enclosing context. */
+ decl = lookup_name_real (name, tag_type != none_type,
/*nonclass=*/0,
/*block_p=*/true, is_namespace, 0);
- if (object_type == unknown_type_node)
- /* The object is type-dependent, so we can't look anything up; we used
- this to get the DR 141 behavior. */
- object_type = NULL_TREE;
parser->object_scope = object_type;
parser->qualifying_scope = NULL_TREE;
}