elfutils/elfutils-0.161-addralign.patch

54 lines
2.1 KiB
Diff

commit 6f5934c1afa8f34bfb8f86b191ded9af854e757f
Author: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Date: Sat Feb 7 15:08:20 2015 +0100
libelf: Consider sh_addralign 0 as 1
Currently the Koji build for arm32 fails with:
extracting debug info from /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/etcd-2.0.0-0.3.rc1.fc22.arm/usr/bin/etcd
Failed to write file: invalid section alignment
This is because the binary etcd
http://people.redhat.com/jkratoch/etcdctl.xz
contains:
Section Headers:
[Nr] Name Type Addr Off Size ES Flg Lk Inf Al
[11] .rel.plt REL 00459ee0 449ee0 000088 08 A 13 0 0
^
which corresponds to golang's code:
go/src/cmd/ld/elf.c
case EM_X86_64:
sh = elfshname(".rela.plt");
sh->addralign = RegSize;
default:
sh = elfshname(".rel.plt");
<nothing>
ELF spec says:
Values 0 and 1 mean the section has no alignment constraints.
and libelf/elf32_updatenull.c really parses it that way at line 204
ElfW2(LIBELFBITS,Word) sh_align = shdr->sh_addralign ?: 1;
but unfortunately the later line being patched no longer does.
libelf/
2015-02-07 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* elf32_updatenull.c (__elfw2(LIBELFBITS,updatenull_wrlock)): Consider
sh_addralign 0 as 1.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
diff --git a/libelf/elf32_updatenull.c b/libelf/elf32_updatenull.c
index be4cea0..5e809b7 100644
--- a/libelf/elf32_updatenull.c
+++ b/libelf/elf32_updatenull.c
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ __elfw2(LIBELFBITS,updatenull_wrlock) (Elf *elf, int *change_bop, size_t shnum)
enough for the largest alignment required by a data
block. */
if (unlikely (! powerof2 (shdr->sh_addralign))
- || unlikely (shdr->sh_addralign < sh_align))
+ || unlikely ((shdr->sh_addralign ?: 1) < sh_align))
{
__libelf_seterrno (ELF_E_INVALID_ALIGN);
return -1;