chromium/chromium-78-pm-crash.patch

44 lines
2.0 KiB
Diff

From e73aed9a5ef15102f29ac31b70290faf5c90f9fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Evan Stade <estade@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 16:01:32 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Fix shutdown crash in ProfileManager.
OnProfileMarkedForPermanentDeletion should move from
ProfileManagerObserver to ProfileObserver, which would also
fix this bug. However, changing the order of members is the
quickest and most cherry-pick-able way to avoid the crash.
Bug: 1005244
Change-Id: If2db68c846dd418cd02864b57b9b543687fa1e03
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1863518
Auto-Submit: Evan Stade <estade@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Roger <droger@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Evan Stade <estade@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#706467}
---
diff --git a/chrome/browser/profiles/profile_manager.h b/chrome/browser/profiles/profile_manager.h
index b60df76d..7d02af7 100644
--- a/chrome/browser/profiles/profile_manager.h
+++ b/chrome/browser/profiles/profile_manager.h
@@ -409,6 +409,10 @@ class ProfileManager : public content::NotificationObserver,
const base::FilePath& profile_dir);
#endif // !defined(OS_ANDROID)
+ // Destroy after |profile_info_cache_| since Profile destruction may trigger
+ // some observers to unregister themselves.
+ base::ObserverList<ProfileManagerObserver> observers_;
+
// Object to cache various information about profiles. Contains information
// about every profile which has been created for this instance of Chrome,
// if it has not been explicitly deleted. It must be destroyed after
@@ -450,8 +454,6 @@ class ProfileManager : public content::NotificationObserver,
// Controls whether to initialize some services. Only disabled for testing.
bool do_final_services_init_ = true;
- base::ObserverList<ProfileManagerObserver> observers_;
-
// TODO(chrome/browser/profiles/OWNERS): Usage of this in profile_manager.cc
// should likely be turned into DCHECK_CURRENTLY_ON(BrowserThread::UI) for
// consistency with surrounding code in the same file but that wasn't trivial