The logic in ir_timer_keyup was inverted.
In case that values aren't equal,
the meaning of the time_is_after_eq_jiffies(ir->keyup_jiffies) is that
ir->keyup_jiffies is after the the jiffies or equally that
that jiffies are before the the ir->keyup_jiffies which is
exactly the situation we want to avoid (that the timeout is in the future)
Confusing Eh?
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
e0172fd373