The naming convension of hardware_[dis|en]able family is little bit confusing because only hardware_[dis|en]able_all are using _nolock suffix. Renaming current hardware_[dis|en]able() to *_nolock() and using hardware_[dis|en]able() as wrapper functions which take kvm_lock for them reduces extra confusion. Signed-off-by: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
kvm |