abaf3787ac
PROC_FS is a bool, so this code is either present or absent. It will never be modular, so using module_init as an alias for __initcall is rather misleading. Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from init.h into module.h in the future. If we don't do this, we'd have to add module.h to obviously non-modular code, and that would be ugly at best. Note that direct use of __initcall is discouraged, vs. one of the priority categorized subgroups. As __initcall gets mapped onto device_initcall, our use of fs_initcall (which makes sense for fs code) will thus change these registrations from level 6-device to level 5-fs (i.e. slightly earlier). However no observable impact of that small difference has been observed during testing, or is expected. Also note that this change uncovers a missing semicolon bug in the registration of vmcore_init as an initcall. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
25 lines
564 B
C
25 lines
564 B
C
#include <linux/fs.h>
|
|
#include <linux/init.h>
|
|
#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
|
|
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
|
|
|
|
extern const struct seq_operations cpuinfo_op;
|
|
static int cpuinfo_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
|
|
{
|
|
return seq_open(file, &cpuinfo_op);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static const struct file_operations proc_cpuinfo_operations = {
|
|
.open = cpuinfo_open,
|
|
.read = seq_read,
|
|
.llseek = seq_lseek,
|
|
.release = seq_release,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static int __init proc_cpuinfo_init(void)
|
|
{
|
|
proc_create("cpuinfo", 0, NULL, &proc_cpuinfo_operations);
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
fs_initcall(proc_cpuinfo_init);
|