1d5f066e0b
Kernel time, which advances in discrete steps may progress much slower than TSC. As a result, when kvmclock is adjusted to a new base, the apparent time to the guest, which runs at a much higher, nsec scaled rate based on the current TSC, may have already been observed to have a larger value (kernel_ns + scaled tsc) than the value to which we are setting it (kernel_ns + 0). We must instead compute the clock as potentially observed by the guest for kernel_ns to make sure it does not go backwards. Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
alpha | ||
arm | ||
avr32 | ||
blackfin | ||
cris | ||
frv | ||
h8300 | ||
ia64 | ||
m32r | ||
m68k | ||
m68knommu | ||
microblaze | ||
mips | ||
mn10300 | ||
parisc | ||
powerpc | ||
s390 | ||
score | ||
sh | ||
sparc | ||
tile | ||
um | ||
x86 | ||
xtensa | ||
.gitignore | ||
Kconfig |