Martin Schwidefsky 595bf2aaca [PATCH] s390: in_interrupt vs. in_atomic ... The condition for no context in do_exception checks for hard and soft interrupts by using in_interrupt() but not for preemption. This is bad for the users of __copy_from/to_user_inatomic because the fault handler might call schedule although the preemption count is != 0. Use in_atomic() instead in_interrupt(). Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>		2005-06-04 17:13:00 -07:00
..
cmm.c	[PATCH] s390: cmm guest sender id	2005-05-01 08:58:58 -07:00
extmem.c
fault.c	[PATCH] s390: in_interrupt vs. in_atomic	2005-06-04 17:13:00 -07:00
init.c	[PATCH] s390: fix memory holes and cleanup setup_arch	2005-05-01 08:58:57 -07:00
ioremap.c
Makefile
mmap.c