Commit Graph

86 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Patrick Caulfield
f1f1c1ccf7 [DLM] Make sock_sem into a mutex
Now that there can be multiple dlm_recv threads running we need to prevent two
recvs running for the same connection - it's unlikely but it can happen and it
causes message corruption.

Signed-Off-By: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-02-05 13:37:44 -05:00
Patrick Caulfield
bd44e2b007 [DLM] fix lowcomms receiving
This patch fixes a bug whereby data on a newly accepted connection would be
ignored if it arrived soon after the accept.

Signed-Off-By: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-02-05 13:37:29 -05:00
Patrick Caulfield
f2f5095f9e [DLM] lowcomms tidy
This patch removes some redundant fields from the connection structure and adds
some lockdep annotation to remove spurious warnings.

Signed-Off-By: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-02-05 13:37:23 -05:00
David Teigland
222d396092 [DLM] fix master recovery
If master recovery happens on an rsb in one recovery sequence, then that
sequence is aborted before lock recovery happens, then in the next
sequence, we rely on the previous master recovery (which may now be
invalid due to another node ignoring a lookup result) and go on do to the
lock recovery where we get stuck due to an invalid master value.

 recovery cycle begins: master of rsb X has left
 nodes A and B send node C an rcom lookup for X to find the new master
 C gets lookup from B first, sets B as new master, and sends reply back to B
 C gets lookup from A next, and sends reply back to A saying B is master
 A gets lookup reply from C and sets B as the new master in the rsb
 recovery cycle on A, B and C is aborted to start a new recovery
 B gets lookup reply from C and ignores it since there's a new recovery
 recovery cycle begins: some other node has joined
 B doesn't think it's the master of X so it doesn't rebuild it in the directory
 C looks up the master of X, no one is master, so it becomes new master
 B looks up the master of X, finds it's C
 A believes that B is the master of X, so it sends its lock to B
 B sends an error back to A
 A resends
 this repeats forever, the incorrect master value on A is never corrected

The fix is to do master recovery on an rsb that still has the NEW_MASTER
flag set from an earlier recovery sequence, and therefore didn't complete
lock recovery.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-02-05 13:36:58 -05:00
David Teigland
a1bc86e6bd [DLM] fix user unlocking
When a user process exits, we clear all the locks it holds.  There is a
problem, though, with locks that the process had begun unlocking before it
exited.  We couldn't find the lkb's that were in the process of being
unlocked remotely, to flag that they are DEAD.  To solve this, we move
lkb's being unlocked onto a new list in the per-process structure that
tracks what locks the process is holding.  We can then go through this
list to flag the necessary lkb's when clearing locks for a process when it
exits.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-02-05 13:36:55 -05:00
Patrick Caulfield
1d6e8131cf [DLM] Use workqueues for dlm lowcomms
This patch converts the DLM TCP lowcomms to use workqueues rather than using its
own daemon functions. Simultaneously removing a lot of code and making it more
scalable on multi-processor machines.

Signed-Off-By: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-02-05 13:36:52 -05:00
David Teigland
d200778e12 [DLM] expose dlm_config_info fields in configfs
Make the dlm_config_info values readable and writeable via configfs
entries.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-02-05 13:36:43 -05:00
David Teigland
99fc64874a [DLM] add config entry to enable log_debug
Add a new dlm_config_info field to enable log_debug output and change
log_debug() to use it.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-02-05 13:36:40 -05:00
David Teigland
68c817a1c4 [DLM] rename dlm_config_info fields
Add a "ci_" prefix to the fields in the dlm_config_info struct so that we
can use macros to add configfs functions to access them (in a later
patch).  No functional changes in this patch, just naming changes.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-02-05 13:36:37 -05:00
David Teigland
8ec6886748 [DLM] change some log_error to log_debug
Some common, non-error messages should use log_debug instead of log_error
so they can be turned off.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-02-05 13:36:34 -05:00
Patrick Caulfield
4edde74eed [DLM] Fix spin lock already unlocked bug
I just noticed this message when testing some other changes I'd made to
lowcomms (to use workqueues) but the problem seems to be in the current
git trees too. I'm amazed no-one has seen it.

    BUG: spinlock already unlocked on CPU#1, dlm_recoverd/16868

Signed-Off-By: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-02-05 13:36:21 -05:00
Patrick Caulfield
3fb4a251fe [DLM] Fix schedule() calls
I was a little over-enthusiastic turning schedule() calls int cond_sched() when fixing the DLM for Andrew Morton.

These four should really be calls to schedule() or the dlm can busy-wait.

Signed-Off-By: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-02-05 13:36:18 -05:00
Adrian Bunk
927255f038 [DLM] fs/dlm/lowcomms-tcp.c: remove 2 functions
Remove the following unused functions:

- lowcomms_send_message()
- lowcomms_max_buffer_size()

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-02-05 13:36:05 -05:00
David Teigland
075529b5e1 [DLM] fix lost flags in stub replies
When the dlm fakes an unlock/cancel reply from a failed node using a stub
message struct, it wasn't setting the flags in the stub message.  So, in
the process of receiving the fake message the lkb flags would be updated
and cleared from the zero flags in the message.  The problem observed in
tests was the loss of the USER flag which caused the dlm to think a user
lock was a kernel lock and subsequently fail an assertion checking the
validity of the ast/callback field.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-02-05 13:36:02 -05:00
David Teigland
8d07fd509e [DLM] fix receive_request() lvb copying
LVB's are not sent as part of new requests, but the code receiving the
request was copying data into the lvb anyway.  The space in the message
where it mistakenly thought the lvb lived actually contained the resource
name, so it wound up incorrectly copying this name data into the lvb.  Fix
is to just create the lvb, not copy junk into it.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-02-05 13:35:59 -05:00
David Teigland
da49f36f4f [DLM] fix send_args() lvb copying
The send_args() function is used to copy parameters into a message for a
number different message types.  Only some of those types are set up
beforehand (in create_message) to include space for sending lvb data.
send_args was wrongly copying the lvb for all message types as long as the
lock had an lvb.  This means that the lvb data was being written past the
end of the message into unknown space.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-02-05 13:35:56 -05:00
David Teigland
9e971b715d [DLM] add version check
Check if we receive a message from another lockspace member running a
version of the dlm with an incompatible inter-node message protocol.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-02-05 13:35:53 -05:00
David Teigland
38aa8b0c59 [DLM] fix old rcom messages
A reply to a recovery message will often be received after the relevant
recovery sequence has aborted and the next recovery sequence has begun.
We need to ignore replies to these old messages from the previous
recovery.  There's already a way to do this for synchronous recovery
requests using the rc_id number, but not for async.

Each recovery sequence already has a locally unique sequence number
associated with it.  This patch adds a field to the rcom (recovery
message) structure where this recovery sequence number can be placed,
rc_seq.  When a node sends a reply to a recovery request, it copies the
rc_seq number it received into rc_seq_reply.  When the first node receives
the reply to its recovery message, it will check whether rc_seq_reply
matches the current recovery sequence number, ls_recover_seq, and if not
then it ignores the old reply.

An old, inadequate approach to filtering out old replies (checking if the
current stage of recovery has moved back to the start) has been removed
from two spots.

The protocol version number is changed to reflect the different rcom
structures.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-02-05 13:35:50 -05:00
David Teigland
dc200a8848 [DLM] fix resend rcom lock
There's a chance the new master of resource hasn't learned it's the new
master before another node sends it a lock during recovery.  The node
sending the lock needs to resend if this happens.

- A sends a master lookup for resource R to C
- B sends a master lookup for resource R to C
- C receives A's lookup, assigns A to be master of R and
  sends a reply back to A
- C receives B's lookup and sends a reply back to B saying
  that A is the master
- B receives lookup reply from C and sends its lock for R to A
- A receives lock from B, doesn't think it's the master of R
  and sends an error back to B
- A receives lookup reply from C and becomes master of R
- B gets error back from A and resends its lock back to A
  (this resending is what this patch does)
- A receives lock from B, it now sees it's the master of R
  and takes the lock

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2007-02-05 13:35:47 -05:00
Patrick Caulfield
c80e7c83d5 [DLM] fix compile warning
This patch fixes a compile warning in lowcomms-tcp.c indicating that
kmem_cache_t is deprecated.

Signed-Off-By: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-12-15 12:51:22 -05:00
Linus Torvalds
1c1afa3c05 Merge master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/steve/gfs2-2.6-nmw
* master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/steve/gfs2-2.6-nmw: (73 commits)
  [DLM] Clean up lowcomms
  [GFS2] Change gfs2_fsync() to use write_inode_now()
  [GFS2] Fix indent in recovery.c
  [GFS2] Don't flush everything on fdatasync
  [GFS2] Add a comment about reading the super block
  [GFS2] Mount problem with the GFS2 code
  [GFS2] Remove gfs2_check_acl()
  [DLM] fix format warnings in rcom.c and recoverd.c
  [GFS2] lock function parameter
  [DLM] don't accept replies to old recovery messages
  [DLM] fix size of STATUS_REPLY message
  [GFS2] fs/gfs2/log.c:log_bmap() fix printk format warning
  [DLM] fix add_requestqueue checking nodes list
  [GFS2] Fix recursive locking in gfs2_getattr
  [GFS2] Fix recursive locking in gfs2_permission
  [GFS2] Reduce number of arguments to meta_io.c:getbuf()
  [GFS2] Move gfs2_meta_syncfs() into log.c
  [GFS2] Fix journal flush problem
  [GFS2] mark_inode_dirty after write to stuffed file
  [GFS2] Fix glock ordering on inode creation
  ...
2006-12-07 09:13:20 -08:00
Christoph Lameter
e18b890bb0 [PATCH] slab: remove kmem_cache_t
Replace all uses of kmem_cache_t with struct kmem_cache.

The patch was generated using the following script:

	#!/bin/sh
	#
	# Replace one string by another in all the kernel sources.
	#

	set -e

	for file in `find * -name "*.c" -o -name "*.h"|xargs grep -l $1`; do
		quilt add $file
		sed -e "1,\$s/$1/$2/g" $file >/tmp/$$
		mv /tmp/$$ $file
		quilt refresh
	done

The script was run like this

	sh replace kmem_cache_t "struct kmem_cache"

Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-12-07 08:39:25 -08:00
Patrick Caulfield
ac33d07105 [DLM] Clean up lowcomms
This fixes up most of the things pointed out by akpm and Pavel Machek
with comments below indicating why some things have been left:

Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>> +static struct nodeinfo *nodeid2nodeinfo(int nodeid, gfp_t alloc)
>> +{
>> +	struct nodeinfo *ni;
>> +	int r;
>> +	int n;
>> +
>> +	down_read(&nodeinfo_lock);
>
> Given that this function can sleep, I wonder if `alloc' is useful.
>
> I see lots of callers passing in a literal "0" for `alloc'.  That's in fact
> a secret (GFP_ATOMIC & ~__GFP_HIGH).  I doubt if that's what you really
> meant.  Particularly as the code could at least have used __GFP_WAIT (aka
> GFP_NOIO) which is much, much more reliable than "0".  In fact "0" is the
> least reliable mode possible.
>
> IOW, this is all bollixed up.

When 0 is passed into nodeid2nodeinfo the function does not try to allocate a
new structure at all. it's an indication that the caller only wants the nodeinfo
struct for that nodeid if there actually is one in existance.
I've tidied the function itself so it's more obvious, (and tidier!)

>> +/* Data received from remote end */
>> +static int receive_from_sock(void)
>> +{
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +	struct msghdr msg;
>> +	struct kvec iov[2];
>> +	unsigned len;
>> +	int r;
>> +	struct sctp_sndrcvinfo *sinfo;
>> +	struct cmsghdr *cmsg;
>> +	struct nodeinfo *ni;
>> +
>> +	/* These two are marginally too big for stack allocation, but this
>> +	 * function is (currently) only called by dlm_recvd so static should be
>> +	 * OK.
>> +	 */
>> +	static struct sockaddr_storage msgname;
>> +	static char incmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))];
>
> whoa.  This is globally singly-threaded code??

Yes. it is only ever run in the context of dlm_recvd.
>>
>> +static void initiate_association(int nodeid)
>> +{
>> +	struct sockaddr_storage rem_addr;
>> +	static char outcmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))];
>
> Another static buffer to worry about.  Globally singly-threaded code?

Yes. Only ever called by dlm_sendd.

>> +
>> +/* Send a message */
>> +static int send_to_sock(struct nodeinfo *ni)
>> +{
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +	struct writequeue_entry *e;
>> +	int len, offset;
>> +	struct msghdr outmsg;
>> +	static char outcmsg[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct sctp_sndrcvinfo))];
>
> Singly-threaded?

Yep.

>>
>> +static void dealloc_nodeinfo(void)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	for (i=1; i<=max_nodeid; i++) {
>> +		struct nodeinfo *ni = nodeid2nodeinfo(i, 0);
>> +		if (ni) {
>> +			idr_remove(&nodeinfo_idr, i);
>
> Didn't that need locking?

Not. it's only ever called at DLM shutdown after all the other threads
have been stopped.

>>
>> +static int write_list_empty(void)
>> +{
>> +	int status;
>> +
>> +	spin_lock_bh(&write_nodes_lock);
>> +	status = list_empty(&write_nodes);
>> +	spin_unlock_bh(&write_nodes_lock);
>> +
>> +	return status;
>> +}
>
> This function's return value is meaningless.  As soon as the lock gets
> dropped, the return value can get out of sync with reality.
>
> Looking at the caller, this _might_ happen to be OK, but it's a nasty and
> dangerous thing.  Really the locking should be moved into the caller.

It's just an optimisation to allow the caller to schedule if there is no work
to do. if something arrives immediately afterwards then it will get picked up
when the process re-awakes (and it will be woken by that arrival).

The 'accepting' atomic has gone completely. as Andrew pointed out it didn't
really achieve much anyway. I suspect it was a plaster over some other
startup or shutdown bug to be honest.


Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
2006-12-07 09:25:13 -05:00
Ryusuke Konishi
57adf7eede [DLM] fix format warnings in rcom.c and recoverd.c
This fixes the following gcc warnings generated on
the architectures where uint64_t != unsigned long long (e.g. ppc64).

fs/dlm/rcom.c:154: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'uint64_t'
fs/dlm/rcom.c:154: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'uint64_t'
fs/dlm/recoverd.c:48: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'uint64_t'
fs/dlm/recoverd.c:202: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'uint64_t'
fs/dlm/recoverd.c:210: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'uint64_t'

Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <ryusuke@osrg.net>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:37:22 -05:00
David Teigland
98f176fb32 [DLM] don't accept replies to old recovery messages
We often abort a recovery after sending a status request to a remote node.
We want to ignore any potential status reply we get from the remote node.
If we get one of these unwanted replies, we've often moved on to the next
recovery message and incremented the message sequence counter, so the
reply will be ignored due to the seq number.  In some cases, we've not
moved on to the next message so the seq number of the reply we want to
ignore is still correct, causing the reply to be accepted.  The next
recovery message will then mistake this old reply as a new one.

To fix this, we add the flag RCOM_WAIT to indicate when we can accept a
new reply.  We clear this flag if we abort recovery while waiting for a
reply.  Before the flag is set again (to allow new replies) we know that
any old replies will be rejected due to their sequence number.  We also
initialize the recovery-message sequence number to a random value when a
lockspace is first created.  This makes it clear when messages are being
rejected from an old instance of a lockspace that has since been
recreated.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:37:14 -05:00
David Teigland
1babdb4531 [DLM] fix size of STATUS_REPLY message
When the not_ready routine sends a "fake" status reply with blank status
flags, it needs to use the correct size for a normal STATUS_REPLY by
including the size of the would-be config parameters.  We also fill in the
non-existant config parameters with an invalid lvblen value so it's easier
to notice if these invalid paratmers are ever being used.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:37:08 -05:00
David Teigland
2896ee37cc [DLM] fix add_requestqueue checking nodes list
Requests that arrive after recovery has started are saved in the
requestqueue and processed after recovery is done.  Some of these requests
are purged during recovery if they are from nodes that have been removed.
We move the purging of the requests (dlm_purge_requestqueue) to later in
the recovery sequence which allows the routine saving requests
(dlm_add_requestqueue) to avoid filtering out requests by nodeid since the
same will be done by the purge.  The current code has add_requestqueue
filtering by nodeid but doesn't hold any locks when accessing the list of
current nodes.  This also means that we need to call the purge routine
when the lockspace is being shut down since the add routine will not be
rejecting requests itself any more.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:37:00 -05:00
Patrick Caulfield
b98c95af01 [DLM] Fix DLM config
The attached patch fixes the DLM config so that it selects the chosen network
transport. It should fix the bug where DLM can be left selected when NET gets
unselected. This incorporates all the comments received about this patch.

Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-Off-By: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:35:41 -05:00
David Teigland
6f90a8b1b8 [DLM] clear sbflags on lock master
RH BZ 211622

The ALTMODE flag can be set in the lock master's copy of the lock but
never cleared, so ALTMODE will also be returned in a subsequent conversion
of the lock when it shouldn't be.  This results in lock_dlm incorrectly
switching to the alternate lock mode when returning the result to gfs
which then asserts when it sees the wrong lock state.  The fix is to
propagate the cleared sbflags value to the master node when the lock is
requested.  QA's d_rwrandirectlarge test triggers this bug very quickly.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:35:27 -05:00
David Teigland
4b77f2c93d [DLM] do full recover_locks barrier
Red Hat BZ 211914

The previous patch "[DLM] fix aborted recovery during
node removal" was incomplete as discovered with further testing.  It set
the bit for the RS_LOCKS barrier but did not then wait for the barrier.
This is often ok, but sometimes it will cause yet another recovery hang.
If it's a new node that also has the lowest nodeid that skips the barrier
wait, then it misses the important step of collecting and reporting the
barrier status from the other nodes (which is the job of the low nodeid in
the barrier wait routine).

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:35:24 -05:00
David Teigland
2cdc98aaf0 [DLM] fix stopping unstarted recovery
Red Hat BZ 211914

When many nodes are joining a lockspace simultaneously, the dlm gets a
quick sequence of stop/start events, a pair for adding each node.
dlm_controld in user space sends dlm_recoverd in the kernel each stop and
start event.  dlm_controld will sometimes send the stop before
dlm_recoverd has had a chance to take up the previously queued start.  The
stop aborts the processing of the previous start by setting the
RECOVERY_STOP flag.  dlm_recoverd is erroneously clearing this flag and
ignoring the stop/abort if it happens to take up the start after the stop
meant to abort it.  The fix is to check the sequence number that's
incremented for each stop/start before clearing the flag.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:35:16 -05:00
David Teigland
91c0dc93a1 [DLM] fix aborted recovery during node removal
Red Hat BZ 211914

With the new cluster infrastructure, dlm recovery for a node removal can
be aborted and restarted for a node addition.  When this happens, the
restarted recovery isn't aware that it's doing recovery for the earlier
removal as well as the addition.  So, it then skips the recovery steps
only required when nodes are removed.  This can result in locks not being
purged for failed/removed nodes.  The fix is to check for removed nodes
for which recovery has not been completed at the start of a new recovery
sequence.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:35:13 -05:00
David Teigland
d4400156d4 [DLM] fix requestqueue race
Red Hat BZ 211914

There's a race between dlm_recoverd (1) enabling locking and (2) clearing
out the requestqueue, and dlm_recvd (1) checking if locking is enabled and
(2) adding a message to the requestqueue.  An order of recoverd(1),
recvd(1), recvd(2), recoverd(2) will result in a message being left on the
requestqueue.  The fix is to have dlm_recvd check if dlm_recoverd has
enabled locking after taking the mutex for the requestqueue and if it has
processing the message instead of queueing it.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:35:10 -05:00
David Teigland
435618b75b [DLM] status messages ping-pong between unmounted nodes
Red Hat BZ 213682

If two nodes leave the lockspace (while unmounting the fs in the case of
gfs) after one has sent a STATUS message to the other, STATUS/STATUS_REPLY
messages will then ping-pong between the nodes when neither of them can
find the lockspace in question any longer.  We kill this by not sending
another STATUS message when we get a STATUS_REPLY for an unknown
lockspace.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:35:06 -05:00
David Teigland
5206980964 [DLM] res_recover_locks_count not reset when recover_locks is aborted
Red Hat BZ 213684

If a node sends an lkb to the new master (RCOM_LOCK message) during
recovery and recovery is then aborted on both nodes before it gets a
reply, the res_recover_locks_count needs to be reset to 0 so that when the
subsequent recovery comes along and sends the lkb to the new master again
the assertion doesn't trigger that checks that counter is zero.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:35:03 -05:00
Patrick Caulfield
fdda387f73 [DLM] Add support for tcp communications
The following patch adds a TCP based communications layer
to the DLM which is compile time selectable. The existing SCTP
layer gives the advantage of allowing multihoming, whereas
the TCP layer has been heavily tested in previous versions of
the DLM and is known to be robust and therefore can be used as
a baseline for performance testing.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-30 10:35:00 -05:00
Patrick Caulfield
e2de7f5655 [DLM] fix oops in kref_put when removing a lockspace
Now that the lockspace struct is freed when the last sysfs object is released
this patch prevents use of that lockspace by sysfs. We attempt to re-get the
lockspace from the lockspace list and fail the request if it has been removed.

Signed-Off-By: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-06 09:28:01 -05:00
Patrick Caulfield
ba542e3b92 [DLM] Fix kref_put oops
This patch fixes the recounting on the lockspace kobject. Previously the lockspace was freed while userspace could have had a
reference to one of its sysfs files, causing an oops in kref_put.

Now the lockspace kfree is moved into the kobject release() function

Signed-Off-By: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-11-06 09:01:07 -05:00
Patrick Caulfield
42fb00838a [DLM] fix iovec length in recvmsg
I didn't spot that the msg_iovlen was set to 2 if there
were two elements in the iovec but left at zero if not :(

I think this might be why bob was still seeing trouble.

Signed-Off-By: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-10-20 09:13:10 -04:00
Patrick Caulfield
4c5e1b1a8c [DLM] fix iovec length in recvmsg
The DLM always passes the iovec length as 1, this is wrong when the circular
buffer wraps round.

Signed-Off-By: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-10-12 17:11:33 -04:00
Adrian Bunk
1ee48af22e [DLM] Kconfig: don't show an empty DLM menu
Don't show an empty "Distributed Lock Manager" menu if IP_SCTP=n.

Reported by Dmytro Bagrii in kernel Bugzilla #7268.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-10-12 17:10:35 -04:00
Al Viro
38d6fd26ea [PATCH] dlm gfp_t annotations
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-10-09 14:19:08 -07:00
Theodore Ts'o
bba9dfd835 [GFS2] inode_diet: Replace inode.u.generic_ip with inode.i_private (gfs)
The following patches reduce the size of the VFS inode structure by 28 bytes
on a UP x86.  (It would be more on an x86_64 system).  This is a 10% reduction
in the inode size on a UP kernel that is configured in a production mode
(i.e., with no spinlock or other debugging functions enabled; if you want to
save memory taken up by in-core inodes, the first thing you should do is
disable the debugging options; they are responsible for a huge amount of bloat
in the VFS inode structure).

This patch:

The filesystem or device-specific pointer in the inode is inside a union,
which is pretty pointless given that all 30+ users of this field have been
using the void pointer.  Get rid of the union and rename it to i_private, with
a comment to explain who is allowed to use the void pointer.  This is just a
cleanup, but it allows us to reuse the union 'u' for something something where
the union will actually be used.

Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
2006-09-28 08:32:24 -04:00
Steven Whitehouse
907b9bceb4 [GFS2/DLM] Fix trailing whitespace
As per Andrew Morton's request, removed trailing whitespace.

Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-09-25 09:26:04 -04:00
David Teigland
fa9f0e4925 [DLM] confirm master for recovered waiting requests
Fixing the following scenario:
- A request is on the waiters list waiting for a reply from a remote node.
- The request is the first one on the resource, so first_lkid is set.
- The remote node fails causing recovery.
- During recovery the requesting node becomes master.
- The request is now processed locally instead of being a remote operation.
- At this point we need to call confirm_master() on the resource since
  we're certain we're now the master node.  This will clear first_lkid.
- We weren't calling confirm_master(), so first_lkid was not being cleared
  causing subsequent requests on that resource to get stuck.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-09-08 17:00:12 -04:00
David Teigland
a1d144c71d [DLM] use snprintf in sysfs show
Use snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, ...) instead of sprintf in sysfs show
methods.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-09-07 09:44:01 -04:00
David Teigland
c6e6f0ba8f [DLM] force removal of user lockspace
Check if the FORCEFREE flag has been provided from user space.  If so, set
the force option to dlm_release_lockspace() so that any remaining locks
will be freed.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-31 12:15:37 -04:00
David Teigland
5f88f1ea16 [DLM] add new lockspace to list ealier
When a new lockspace was being created, the recoverd thread was being
started for it before the lockspace was added to the global list of
lockspaces.  The new thread was looking up the lockspace in the global
list and sometimes not finding it due to the race with the original thread
adding it to the list.  We need to add the lockspace to the global list
before starting the thread instead of after, and if the new thread can't
find the lockspace for some reason, it should return an error.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-25 10:02:53 -04:00
David Teigland
233e515f40 [DLM] recover_locks not clearing NEW_MASTER flag
When there are no locks on a resource, the recover_locks() function fails
to clear the NEW_MASTER flag by going directly to out, missing the line
that clears the flag.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-24 09:38:19 -04:00
David Teigland
f5888750aa [DLM] sequence number missing in not_ready reply
When a status reply is sent for a lockspace that doesn't yet exist, the
message sequence number from the sender was not being copied into the
reply causing the sender to ignore the reply.

Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
2006-08-24 09:37:43 -04:00