Commit Graph

18 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Al Viro
30eb43d314 nilfs2: i_nlink races in rename()
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2011-03-03 01:28:17 -05:00
Ryusuke Konishi
622daaff0a nilfs2: fiemap support
This adds fiemap to nilfs.  Two new functions, nilfs_fiemap and
nilfs_find_uncommitted_extent are added.

nilfs_fiemap() implements the fiemap inode operation, and
nilfs_find_uncommitted_extent() helps to get a range of data blocks
whose physical location has not been determined.

nilfs_fiemap() collects extent information by looping through
nilfs_bmap_lookup_contig and nilfs_find_uncommitted_extent routines.

Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
2011-01-10 14:05:46 +09:00
Al Viro
7de9c6ee3e new helper: ihold()
Clones an existing reference to inode; caller must already hold one.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2010-10-25 21:26:11 -04:00
Ryusuke Konishi
dc3d3b810a nilfs2: deny write access to inodes in snapshots
Snapshots of nilfs are read-only.

After super block instances (sb) will be unified, nilfs will need to
check write access by a way other than implicit test with
IS_RDONLY(inode).  This is because IS_RDONLY() refers to MS_RDONLY bit
of inode->i_sb->s_flags and it will become inaccurate after the
unification of sb.

To prepare for the issue, this uses i_op->permission to deny write
access to inodes in snapshots.

Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
2010-10-23 09:24:35 +09:00
Ryusuke Konishi
8e656fd518 nilfs2: make snapshots in checkpoint tree exportable
The previous export operations cannot handle multiple versions of
a filesystem if they belong to the same sb instance.

This adds a new type of file handle and extends export operations so
that they can get the inode specified by a checkpoint number as well
as an inode number and a generation number.

Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
2010-10-23 09:24:34 +09:00
Ryusuke Konishi
4d8d9293dc nilfs2: set pointer to root object in inodes
This puts a pointer to nilfs_root object in the private part of
on-memory inode, and makes nilfs_iget function pick up the inode with
the same root object.

Non-root inodes inherit its nilfs_root object from parent inode.  That
of the root inode is allocated through nilfs_attach_checkpoint()
function.

Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
2010-10-23 09:24:34 +09:00
Al Viro
0319003d0d nilfs really shouldn't slap struct dentry on stack...
... especially when it only needs (and initializes) .d_name of it

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2010-03-03 14:07:58 -05:00
Jiro SEKIBA
abdb318b79 nilfs2: replace mark_inode_dirty as nilfs_mark_inode_dirty
Replace mark_inode_dirty() as nilfs_mark_inode_dirty()
to reduce deep function calls.

Signed-off-by: Jiro SEKIBA <jir@unicus.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
2009-11-27 20:05:16 +09:00
Jiro SEKIBA
3534573b58 nilfs2: delete mark_inode_dirty in nilfs_delete_entry
Delete mark_inode_dirty() in nilfs_delete_entry() to reduce duplicate
mark_inode_dirty() calls both in nilfs_rename() and nilfs_delete_entry().

Signed-off-by: Jiro SEKIBA <jir@unicus.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
2009-11-27 20:05:16 +09:00
Jiro SEKIBA
58d55471cb nilfs2: delete mark_inode_dirty in nilfs_commit_chunk
Delete mark_inode_dirty() in nilfs_commit_chunk(), for callers of
nilfs_commit_chunk() will call equivalent mark_inode_dirty()
after calling nilfs_commit_chunk().

Signed-off-by: Jiro SEKIBA <jir@unicus.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
2009-11-27 20:05:16 +09:00
Jiro SEKIBA
4cd76c3c93 nilfs2: split nilfs_unlink as nilfs_do_unlink and nilfs_unlink
Split nilfs_unlink() to reduce nested transaction and duplicate
mark_inode_dirty() calls when calling nilfs_unlink() from nilfs_rmdir().

nilfs_do_unlink() is an actual unlink functionality which is not
in transaction and does not call mark_inode_dirty() for dentry argument.

nilfs_unlink() is a wrapper function for do_nilfs_unlink() with
transaction and mark_inode_dirty() for dentry argument.

Signed-off-by: Jiro SEKIBA <jir@unicus.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
2009-11-27 20:05:15 +09:00
Jiro SEKIBA
1749147276 nilfs2: delete redundant mark_inode_dirty
delete redundant mark_inode_dirty() calls

Signed-off-by: Jiro SEKIBA <jir@unicus.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
2009-11-27 20:05:15 +09:00
Jiro SEKIBA
565de406e7 nilfs2: expand inode_inc_link_count and inode_dec_link_count
This is an intermidiate patch to reduce redandunt mark_inode_dirty() calls
by calling inode_inc_link_count() and inode_dec_link_count() functions.

Signed-off-by: Jiro SEKIBA <jir@unicus.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
2009-11-27 20:05:15 +09:00
Jiro SEKIBA
43f8bc262f nilfs2: delete mark_inode_dirty from nilfs_set_link
Delete mark_inode_dirty() from nilfs_set_link() to reduce redundant
mark_inode_dirty() calls in caller of nilfs_set_link().

Signed-off-by: Jiro SEKIBA <jir@unicus.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
2009-11-27 20:05:15 +09:00
Jiro SEKIBA
9ca941d4b6 nilfs2: delete mark_inode_dirty in nilfs_new_inode
It is redundant to call mark_inode_dirty() in nilfs_new_inode() because
all caller of nilfs_new_inode() will call mark_inode_dirty()
after calling nilfs_new_inode() directly or indirectly in transaction.

Signed-off-by: Jiro SEKIBA <jir@unicus.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
2009-11-27 20:05:15 +09:00
Alexey Dobriyan
6e1d5dcc2b const: mark remaining inode_operations as const
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-09-22 07:17:24 -07:00
Ryusuke Konishi
47420c7998 nilfs2: avoid double error caused by nilfs_transaction_end
Pekka Enberg pointed out that double error handlings found after
nilfs_transaction_end() can be avoided by separating abort operation:

 OK, I don't understand this. The only way nilfs_transaction_end() can
 fail is if we have NILFS_TI_SYNC set and we fail to construct the
 segment. But why do we want to construct a segment if we don't commit?

 I guess what I'm asking is why don't we have a separate
 nilfs_transaction_abort() function that can't fail for the erroneous
 case to avoid this double error value tracking thing?

This does the separation and renames nilfs_transaction_end() to
nilfs_transaction_commit() for clarification.

Since, some calls of these functions were used just for exclusion control
against the segment constructor, they are replaced with semaphore
operations.

Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-04-07 08:31:17 -07:00
Ryusuke Konishi
d25006523d nilfs2: pathname operations
This adds pathname operations, most of which comes from the ext2 file
system.

Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-04-07 08:31:15 -07:00