Commit Graph

336 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jani Nikula
696173b064 drm/i915: extract intel_pm.h from intel_drv.h
It used to be handy that we only had a couple of headers, but over time
intel_drv.h has become unwieldy. Extract declarations to a separate
header file corresponding to the implementation module, clarifying the
modularity of the driver.

Ensure the new header is self-contained, and do so with minimal further
includes, using forward declarations as needed. Include the new header
only where needed, and sort the modified include directives while at it
and as needed.

No functional changes.

v2: gen6_rps_reset_ei() is in i915_irq.c not intel_pm.c.

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/adc6463b95eef3440fba9826793f7d1c5f3b0b4a.1554461791.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2019-04-08 09:52:43 +03:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
3de6f85294 drm/i915: rename init/fini/prune uncore functions
Add "_mmio" postfix to be consistent from the init/fini phase they're
called from.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190402201032.15841-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-04-03 10:04:46 +01:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
6cbe883036 drm/i915: add intel_uncore_init_early
Encapsulate the uncore early init and be consistent with the
"_early" naming.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190402201032.15841-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-04-03 10:04:44 +01:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
f6ac993fb0 drm/i915: move the edram detection out of uncore init
edram is not part of uncore and there is no requirement for the
detection to be done before we initialize the uncore functions. The
first check on HAS_EDRAM is in the ggtt_init path, so move it to
i915_driver_init_hw, where other dram-related detection happens.

While at it, save the size in MB instead of the capabilities because the
size is the only thing we look at outside of the init function.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190328174533.31532-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-03-29 11:18:41 +00:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
baba6e572b drm/i915: take a reference to uncore in the engine and use it
A few advantages:

- Prepares us for the planned split of display uncore from GT uncore

- Improves our engine-centric view of the world in the engine code
  and allows us to avoid jumping back to dev_priv.

- Allows us to wrap accesses to engine register in nice macros that
  automatically pick the right mmio base.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190325214940.23632-10-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-03-26 20:20:40 +00:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
97a04e0d07 drm/i915: switch intel_wait_for_register to uncore
The intel_uncore structure is the owner of register access, so
subclass the function to it.

While at it, use a local uncore var and switch to the new read/write
functions where it makes sense.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190325214940.23632-9-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-03-26 20:20:24 +00:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
d2d551c06f drm/i915: intel_wait_for_register_fw to uncore
The intel_uncore structure is the owner of register access, so
subclass the function to it.

While at it, use a local uncore var and switch to the new read/write
functions where it makes sense.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190325214940.23632-8-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-03-26 20:16:45 +00:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
4319382e9b drm/i915: switch intel_uncore_forcewake_for_reg to intel_uncore
The intel_uncore structure is the owner of FW, so subclass the
function to it.

While at it, use a local uncore var and switch to the new read/write
functions where it makes sense.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190325214940.23632-7-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-03-26 20:16:31 +00:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
a2b4abfc62 drm/i915: switch uncore mmio funcs to use intel_uncore
The full read/write ops can now work on the intel_uncore struct.
Introduce intel_uncore_read/write functions working on intel_uncore
and switch the I915_READ/WRITE macro to internally call those.

v2: no change
v3: add intel_uncore_read/write functions (Chris), update commit msg

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190325214940.23632-6-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-03-26 20:16:13 +00:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
eb17af67eb drm/i915: take a ref to the rpm in the uncore structure
Remove a bit of pointer dancing in the reg access path.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190325214940.23632-5-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-03-26 20:16:04 +00:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2cf7bf6f2f drm/i915: add uncore flags for unclaimed mmio
Save the HW capabilities to avoid having to jump back to dev_priv
every time.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190325214940.23632-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-03-26 19:30:59 +00:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
5a0ba77709 drm/i915: add HAS_FORCEWAKE flag to uncore
We have several cases where we don't have forcewake (older gens, GVT and
planned display-only uncore), so, instead of checking every time against
the various condition, save the info in a flag and use that.

Note that this patch also change the behavior for gen5 with vpgu
enabled, but this is not an issue since we don't support vgpu on gen5.

v2: split out from previous path, fix check for missing case (Paulo)
v3: Inline helper for clarity in testing flags

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190325214940.23632-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-03-26 19:25:49 +00:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
6cc5ca7688 drm/i915: rename raw reg access functions
They now work on uncore, so use raw_uncore_ prefix. Also move them to
uncore.h

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190325214940.23632-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-03-26 19:15:15 +00:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
6ebc9692a7 drm/i915: make raw access function work on uncore
This allows us to ditch i915 in some more places.

v2: use local var in check_vgpu (Paulo)

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190319183543.13679-9-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-03-20 21:12:50 +00:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
25286aaca9 drm/i915: move regs pointer inside the uncore structure
This will allow futher simplifications in the uncore handling.

v2: move register access setup under uncore (Chris)

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190319183543.13679-8-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-03-20 21:12:50 +00:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
272c7e5230 drm/i915: reduce the dev_priv->uncore dance in uncore.c
Use a local variable where it makes sense.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190319183543.13679-7-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-03-20 21:12:50 +00:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
cb7ee69015 drm/i915: make find_fw_domain work on intel_uncore
Remove unneeded usage of dev_priv from 1 extra function.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190319183543.13679-6-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-03-20 21:12:50 +00:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
f7de50278e drm/i915: make more uncore function work on intel_uncore
Move the init, fini, prune, suspend, resume function to work on
intel_uncore instead of dev_priv.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190319183543.13679-5-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-03-20 21:12:42 +00:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
3ceea6a1b4 drm/i915: use intel_uncore for all forcewake get/put
Now that the internal code all works on intel_uncore, flip the
external-facing interface.

v2: fix GVT.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190319183543.13679-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-03-20 21:12:31 +00:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
f568eeee53 drm/i915: use intel_uncore in fw get/put internal paths
Get/put functions used outside of uncore.c are updated in the next
patch for a nicer split.

v2: use dev_priv where we still have it (Paulo)

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190319183543.13679-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-03-20 21:12:26 +00:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
159367bb9e drm/i915: always use masks on FW regs
Upper bits are reserved on gen6, so no issue if we write them. Note that
we're already doing this in the non-MT case of IVB, which uses the same
register.

Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190320122732.14512-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-03-20 20:25:45 +00:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
535d8d27c0 drm/i915: do not pass dev_priv to low-level forcewake functions
The only usage we have for it is for the regs pointer. Save a pointer to
the set and ack registers instead of the register offsets to remove this
requirement

v2: Keep passing uncore down to the lowest levels to avoid repeated
pointer chasing in the innermost loops:

add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 3/15 up/down: 33/-155 (-122)
Function                                     old     new   delta
fw_domain_init                               320     351     +31
hdmi_port_clock_valid                        319     320      +1
g4x_pre_enable_dp                            364     365      +1
ring_request_alloc                          1852    1851      -1
intel_engine_lookup_user                      50      49      -1
gen11_irq_handler                            738     737      -1
__intel_uncore_forcewake_get                 115     112      -3
intel_uncore_fw_release_timer                198     194      -4
i915_forcewake_domains                       154     150      -4
fw_domain_fini                               172     168      -4
__intel_uncore_forcewake_put                 163     159      -4
___force_wake_auto                           138     134      -4
fw_domains_put                                98      92      -6
__err_print_to_sgl                          4058    4052      -6
intel_uncore_forcewake_reset                 459     444     -15
fw_domains_get                               563     548     -15
fw_domain_wait_ack_with_fallback             490     450     -40
fw_domains_get_with_fallback                 875     828     -47

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190313231319.711-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190316100045.20240-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-03-16 10:43:53 +00:00
Ville Syrjälä
39806c3f11 drm/i915: Include register polling in reg_rw traces
We generally omit register polling from the i915_reg_rw tracepoint.
Understandable since polling could generate a lot of noise in the
trace. The downside is that the trace is incomplete. As a compromise
let's trace the final register value observed while polling. That
should be generally sufficient to observe what the code should be
doing next.

I suppose in some cases it might make sense to also trace the initial
register value, and maybe the number of times we polled. But that
would require a separate tracepoint so let's leave it for the future.

The other users of _NOTRACE() are i915_pmu and i2c bitbanging,
which I decided to leave alone.

Next we should do something to claw back the tracepoints for
planes and whatnot which were switched to _FW() a while back.
I guess just new macros for raw_rw+trace. The question is
what to call it?

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190204211644.21967-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
2019-02-05 20:44:43 +02:00
Chris Wilson
9f58892ea9 drm/i915: Pull all the reset functionality together into i915_reset.c
Currently the code to reset the GPU and our state is spread widely
across a few files. Pull the logic together into a common file.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190116153304.787-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-01-16 22:45:31 +00:00
Chris Wilson
d4225a535b drm/i915: Syntatic sugar for using intel_runtime_pm
Frequently, we use intel_runtime_pm_get/_put around a small block.
Formalise that usage by providing a macro to define such a block with an
automatic closure to scope the intel_runtime_pm wakeref to that block,
i.e. macro abuse smelling of python.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190114142129.24398-15-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-01-14 16:18:25 +00:00
Chris Wilson
538ef96b9d drm/i915/gem: Track the rpm wakerefs
Keep track of the temporary rpm wakerefs used for user access to the
device, so that we can cancel them upon release and clearly identify any
leaks.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190114142129.24398-10-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-01-14 16:18:13 +00:00
Chris Wilson
16e4dd0342 drm/i915: Markup paired operations on wakerefs
The majority of runtime-pm operations are bounded and scoped within a
function; these are easy to verify that the wakeref are handled
correctly. We can employ the compiler to help us, and reduce the number
of wakerefs tracked when debugging, by passing around cookies provided
by the various rpm_get functions to their rpm_put counterpart. This
makes the pairing explicit, and given the required wakeref cookie the
compiler can verify that we pass an initialised value to the rpm_put
(quite handy for double checking error paths).

For regular builds, the compiler should be able to eliminate the unused
local variables and the program growth should be minimal. Fwiw, it came
out as a net improvement as gcc was able to refactor rpm_get and
rpm_get_if_in_use together,

v2: Just s/rpm_put/rpm_put_unchecked/ everywhere, leaving the manual
mark up for smaller more targeted patches.
v3: Mention the cookie in Returns

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190114142129.24398-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-01-14 16:17:53 +00:00
Jani Nikula
a0f04cc27c drm/i915: always use INTEL_INFO() to access device info
Hide the way device info is stored, in preparation of making device info
a pointer to the const rodata in i915_pci.c. No functional changes.

Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/3cd626f248c0d6638f1288938bbb577a12286050.1546267488.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2019-01-02 12:48:16 +02:00
Jani Nikula
0258404f9d drm/i915: start moving runtime device info to a separate struct
First move the low hanging fruit, the fields that are only initialized
runtime. Use RUNTIME_INFO() exclusively to access the fields.

Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/c24fe7a4b0492a888690c46814c0ff21ce2f12b1.1546267488.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2019-01-02 12:46:29 +02:00
Oscar Mateo
f513ac7653 drm/i915/icl: Mind the SFC units when resetting VD or VEBox engines
SFC (Scaler & Format Converter) units are shared between VD and VEBoxes.
They also happen to have separate reset bits. So, whenever we want to reset
one or more of the media engines, we have to make sure the SFCs do not
change owner in the process and, if this owner happens to be one of the
engines being reset, we need to reset the SFC as well.

This happens in 4 steps:

1) Tell the engine that a software reset is going to happen. The engine
will then try to force lock the SFC (if currently locked, it will
remain so; if currently unlocked, it will ignore this and all new lock
requests).

2) Poll the ack bit to make sure the hardware has received the forced
lock from the driver. Once this bit is set, it indicates SFC status
(lock or unlock) will not change anymore (until we tell the engine it
is safe to unlock again).

3) Check the usage bit to see if the SFC has ended up being locked to
the engine we want to reset. If this is the case, we have to reset
the SFC as well.

4) Unlock all the SFCs once the reset sequence is completed.

Obviously, if we are resetting the whole GPU, we don't have to worry
about all of this.

BSpec: 10989
BSpec: 10990
BSpec: 10954
BSpec: 10955
BSpec: 10956
BSpec: 19212

Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181213091522.2926-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-12-13 10:07:56 +00:00
Lucas De Marchi
f3ce44a09a drm/i915: merge gen checks to use range
Instead of using IS_GEN() for consecutive gen checks, let's pass the
range to IS_GEN_RANGE(). By code inspection these were the ranges deemed
necessary for spatch:

@@
expression e;
@@
(
- IS_GEN(e, 3) || IS_GEN(e, 2)
+ IS_GEN_RANGE(e, 2, 3)
|
- IS_GEN(e, 3) || IS_GEN(e, 4)
+ IS_GEN_RANGE(e, 3, 4)
|
- IS_GEN(e, 5) || IS_GEN(e, 6)
+ IS_GEN_RANGE(e, 5, 6)
|
- IS_GEN(e, 6) || IS_GEN(e, 7)
+ IS_GEN_RANGE(e, 6, 7)
|
- IS_GEN(e, 7) || IS_GEN(e, 8)
+ IS_GEN_RANGE(e, 7, 8)
|
- IS_GEN(e, 8) || IS_GEN(e, 9)
+ IS_GEN_RANGE(e, 8, 9)
|
- IS_GEN(e, 10) || IS_GEN(e, 9)
+ IS_GEN_RANGE(e, 9, 10)
|
- IS_GEN(e, 9) || IS_GEN(e, 10)
+ IS_GEN_RANGE(e, 9, 10)
)

After conversion, checking we don't have any missing IS_GEN_RANGE() ||
IS_GEN() was also done.

Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181212181044.15886-3-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
2018-12-12 16:54:09 -08:00
Lucas De Marchi
cf819eff90 drm/i915: replace IS_GEN<N> with IS_GEN(..., N)
Define IS_GEN() similarly to our IS_GEN_RANGE(). but use gen instead of
gen_mask to do the comparison. Now callers can pass then gen as a parameter,
so we don't require one macro for each gen.

The following spatch was used to convert the users of these macros:

@@
expression e;
@@
(
- IS_GEN2(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 2)
|
- IS_GEN3(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 3)
|
- IS_GEN4(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 4)
|
- IS_GEN5(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 5)
|
- IS_GEN6(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 6)
|
- IS_GEN7(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 7)
|
- IS_GEN8(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 8)
|
- IS_GEN9(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 9)
|
- IS_GEN10(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 10)
|
- IS_GEN11(e)
+ IS_GEN(e, 11)
)

v2: use IS_GEN rather than GT_GEN and compare to info.gen rather than
    using the bitmask

Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181212181044.15886-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
2018-12-12 16:52:10 -08:00
Lucas De Marchi
0069000877 drm/i915: Rename IS_GEN to IS_GEN_RANGE
RANGE makes it longer, but clearer. We are also going to add a macro to
check an individual gen, so add the _RANGE prefix here.

Diff generated with:

sed 's/IS_GEN(/IS_GEN_RANGE(/g' drivers/gpu/drm/i915/{*/,}*.{c,h} -i

v2: use IS_GEN rather than GT_GEN

Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181212181044.15886-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
2018-12-12 16:51:49 -08:00
Rodrigo Vivi
ac12891848 drm/i915: uncore_fw_domains_init sort platforms newer-to-older
No functional change.

Just sorting this "if" statement from newer to older platform.

Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181022171526.15641-5-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
2018-10-22 14:40:43 -07:00
Chris Wilson
a167b1e131 drm/i915: Pull intel_uncore_arm_unclaimed_mmio_detection() under the spinlock
Elsewhere we manipulate uncore.unclaimed_mmio_check and
i915_param.mmio_debug under the irq lock (e.g. preserving the current
value across a user forcewake grab), but do not protect the manipulation
inside intel_uncore_arm_unclaimed_mmio_detection() from concurrent
access, even from itself. This is an issue as we do call
arm_unclaimed_mmio_detection from multiple threads without coordination.

Suggested-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intelcom>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180904131207.17563-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-09-04 16:01:14 +01:00
Chris Wilson
7ef4ac6ed9 drm/i915: Double check we didn't miss an unclaimed register access
Currently, if the user has enabled mmio-debug around each register
access, we presume that we have then checked them all. However, it is
still possible through omission (raw register access) or external
interaction that the unclaimed access was not highlighted.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180904111732.24266-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-09-04 14:28:51 +01:00
Mika Kuoppala
f4e60c5cfb drm/i915: Force reset on unready engine
If engine reports that it is not ready for reset, we
give up. Evidence shows that forcing a per engine reset
on an engine which is not reporting to be ready for reset,
can bring it back into a working order. There is risk that
we corrupt the context image currently executing on that
engine. But that is a risk worth taking as if we unblock
the engine, we prevent a whole device wedging in a case
of full gpu reset.

Reset individual engine even if it reports that it is not
prepared for reset, but only if we aim for full gpu reset
and not on first reset attempt.

v2: force reset only on later attempts, readability (Chris)
v3: simplify with adequate caffeine levels (Chris)
v4: comment about risks and migitations (Chris)

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180813130116.7250-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
2018-08-13 17:00:00 +03:00
Mika Kuoppala
e02e65001e drm/i915: Expose retry count to per gen reset logic
There is a possibility for per gen reset logic to
be more nasty if the softer approach on resetting does
not bear fruit.

Expose retry count to per gen reset logic if it
wants to take such tough measures.

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180810140036.24240-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
2018-08-13 16:59:59 +03:00
Chris Wilson
d60996ab43 drm/i915: Restore user forcewake domains across suspend
On suspend, we cancel the automatic forcewake and clear all other sources
of forcewake so the machine can sleep before we do suspend. However, we
expose the forcewake to userspace (only via debugfs, but nevertheless we
do) and want to restore that upon resume or else our accounting will be
off and we may not acquire the forcewake before we use it. So record
which domains we cleared on suspend and reacquire them early on resume.

v2: Hold the spinlock to appease our sanitychecks
v3: s/fw_domains_user/fw_domains_saved/ to convey intent more clearly

Reported-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: b847305080 ("drm/i915: Fix forcewake active domain tracking")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180808210842.3555-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-08-09 14:25:46 +01:00
Chris Wilson
a5b22b5ed8 drm/i915: Show stack (by WARN) for hitting forcewake errors
On Sandybridge, we need a workaround to wait for the CPU thread to wake
up before we are sure that we have enabled the GT power well. However,
we do see the errors being reported and failed reads returning spurious
results. To try and capture more details as it fails, promote the error
into a WARN so we grab the stacktrace, and to try and reduce the
frequency of error increase the timeout from 500us to 5ms.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180720111102.11549-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-07-24 11:55:20 +01:00
Mika Kuoppala
39e78234b0 drm/i915: Add WaKBLVECSSemaphoreWaitPoll
There is a problem with kbl up to rev E0 where a heavy
memory/fabric traffic from adjacent engine(s) can cause an engine
reset to fail. This traffic can be from normal memory accesses
or it can be from heavy polling on a semaphore wait.

For engine hogging causing a fail, we already fallback to
full reset. Which effectively stops all engines and thus
we only add a workaround documentation.

For the semaphore wait loop poll case, we add one microsecond
poll interval to semaphore wait to guarantee bandwidth for
the reset preration. The side effect is that we make semaphore
completion latencies also 1us longer.

v2: Let full reset handle the adjacent engine idling (Chris)
v3: Skip render engine (Joonas), please checkpatch on define (Mika)

References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106684
References: VTHSD#2227190, HSDES#1604216706, BSID#0917
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180607172444.17080-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
2018-06-08 12:16:20 +03:00
Mika Kuoppala
c30acb04e7 drm/i915: Cancel reset preparations on failed resets
Our reset handling has a retry layer further up in the
chain. As we have told the engine to prepare for reset,
and failed it, make sure to remove that preparation so
that the next attempted reset has a clean slate by triggering
another full prepare cycle for the engines.

v2: ret as int, simplified cleanup (Chris)

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180605160357.32591-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
2018-06-08 12:16:19 +03:00
Chris Wilson
3f6e982230 drm/i915: Stop parking the signaler around reset
We cannot call kthread_park() from softirq context, so let's avoid it
entirely during the reset. We wanted to suspend the signaler so that it
would not mark a request as complete at the same time as we marked it as
being in error. Instead of parking the signaling, stop the engine from
advancing so that the GPU doesn't emit the breadcrumb for our chosen
"guilty" request.

v2: Refactor setting STOP_RING so that we don't have the same code thrice

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michałt Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
CC: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180516183355.10553-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-05-16 20:20:39 +01:00
Oscar Mateo
cc38cae7c4 drm/i915/icl: Introduce initial Icelake Workarounds
Inherit workarounds from previous platforms that are still valid for
Icelake.

v2: GEN7_ROW_CHICKEN2 is masked
v3:
  - Since it has been fixed already in upstream, removed the TODO
    comment about WA_SET_BIT for WaInPlaceDecompressionHang.
  - Squashed with this patch:
      drm/i915/icl: add icelake_init_clock_gating()
    from Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
  - Squashed with this patch:
      drm/i915/icl: WaForceEnableNonCoherent
    from Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
  - WaPushConstantDereferenceHoldDisable is now Wa_1604370585 and
    applies to B0 as well.
  - WaPipeControlBefore3DStateSamplePattern WABB was being applied
    to ICL incorrectly.
v4:
  - Wrap the commit message
  - s/dev_priv/p to please checkpatch
v5: Rebased on top of the WA refactoring
v6: Rebased on top of further whitelist registers refactoring (Michel)
v7: Added WaRsForcewakeAddDelayForAck
v8: s/ICL_HDC_CHICKEN0/ICL_HDC_MODE (Mika)
v9:
  - C, not lisp (Chris)
  - WaIncreaseDefaultTLBEntries is the same for GEN > 9_LP (Tvrtko)

Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1525814984-20039-2-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.com
2018-05-11 15:53:20 +03:00
Michel Thierry
e34b0345e6 drm/i915/icl: Add reset control register changes
The bits used to reset the different engines/domains have changed in
GEN11, this patch maps the reset engine mask bits with the new bits
in the reset control register.

v2: Use shift-left instead of BIT macro to match the file style (Paulo).
v3: Reuse gen8_reset_engines (Daniele).
v4: Do not call intel_uncore_forcewake_reset after reset, we may be
using the forcewake to read protected registers elsewhere and those
results may be clobbered by the concurrent dropping of forcewake.

bspec: 19212
Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Cc: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Acked-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180405140052.10682-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
2018-04-06 15:33:04 +03:00
Chris Wilson
3df82dd43b drm/i915: Only warn for might_sleep() before a slow wait_for_register
As intel_wait_for_register_fw() may use, and if successful only use, a
busy-wait loop, the might_sleep() warning is a little over-zealous.
Restrict it to a might_sleep_if() a slow timeout is specified (and so
the caller authorises use of a usleep).

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180329224519.13598-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-03-30 10:05:59 +01:00
Chris Wilson
5807e1c21d drm/i915: Avoid sleeping inside per-engine reset
Only sleep and repeat when asked for a full device reset (ALL_ENGINES)
and avoid using sleeping waits when asked for a per-engine reset. The
goal is to be able to use a per-engine reset from hardirq/softirq/timer
context. A consequence is that our individual wait timeouts are a
thousand times shorter, on the order of a hundred microseconds rather
than hundreds of millisecond. This may make hitting the timeouts more
common, but hopefully the fallover to the full-device reset will be
sufficient to pick up the pieces.

Note, that the sleeps inside older gen (pre-gen8) have been left as they
are only used in full device reset mode.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
CC: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180329224519.13598-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-03-30 10:05:59 +01:00
Chris Wilson
0f36a85c3b drm/i915: Flush pending interrupt following a GPU reset
After resetting the GPU (or subset of engines), call synchronize_irq()
to flush any pending irq before proceeding with the cleanup. For a
device level reset, we disable the interupts around the reset, but when
resetting just one engine, we have to avoid such global disabling. This
leaves us open to an interrupt arriving for the engine as we try to
reset it. We already do try to flush the IIR following the reset, but we
have to ensure that the in-flight interrupt does not land after we start
cleaning up after the reset; enter synchronize_irq().

As it current stands, we very rarely, but fatally, see sequences such as:

    2.... 57964564us : execlists_reset_prepare: rcs0
    2.... 57964613us : execlists_reset: rcs0 seqno=424
    0d.h1 57964615us : gen8_cs_irq_handler: rcs0 CS active=1
    2d..1 57964617us : __i915_request_unsubmit: rcs0 fence 29:1056 <- global_seqno 1060
    2.... 57964703us : execlists_reset_finish: rcs0
    0..s. 57964705us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 awake?=1, active=0, irq-posted?=1

v2: Move the sync into the execlists reset handler so that we coordinate
the flush with disabling the interrupt handling and canceling the
pending interrupt.
v3: Just use synchronize_hardirq() to avoid the might_sleep(), we do not
yet have threaded-irq to worry about.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180322073533.5313-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
2018-03-22 20:34:50 +00:00
Oscar Mateo
26376a7e74 drm/i915/icl: Check for fused-off VDBOX and VEBOX instances
In Gen11, the Video Decode engines (aka VDBOX, aka VCS, aka BSD) and the
Video Enhancement engines (aka VEBOX, aka VECS) could be fused off. Also,
each VDBOX and VEBOX has its own power well, which only exist if the
related engine exists in the HW.

Unfortunately, we have a Catch-22 situation going on: we need the blitter
forcewake to read the register with the fuse info, but we cannot initialize
the forcewake domains without knowin about the engines present in the HW.
We workaround this problem by allowing the initialization of all forcewake
domains and then pruning the fused off ones, as per the fuse information.

Bspec: 20680

v2: We were shifting incorrectly for vebox disable (Vinay)

v3: Assert mmio is ready and warn if we have attempted to initialize
    forcewake for fused-off engines (Paulo)

v4:
  - Use INTEL_GEN in new code (Tvrtko)
  - Shorter local variable (Tvrtko, Michal)
  - Keep "if (!...) continue" style (Tvrtko)
  - No unnecessary BUG_ON (Tvrtko)
  - WARN_ON and cleanup if wrong mask (Tvrtko, Michal)
  - Use I915_READ_FW (Michal)
  - Use I915_MAX_VCS/VECS macros (Michal)

v5: Rebased by Rodrigo fixing conflicts on top of:
    "drm/i915: Simplify intel_engines_init"

v6: Fix v5. Remove info->num_rings. (by Oscar)

v7: Rebase (Rodrigo).

v8:
  - s/intel_device_info_fused_off_engines/
    intel_device_info_init_mmio (Chris)
  - Make vdbox_disable & vebox_disable local variables (Chris)

v9:
  - Move function declaration to intel_device_info.h (Michal)
  - Missing indent in bit fields definitions (Michal)
  - When RC6 is enabled by BIOS, the fuse register cannot be read until
    the blitter powerwell is awake. Shuffle where the fuse is read, prune
    the forcewake domains after the fact and change the commit message
    accordingly (Vinay, Sagar, Chris).

v10:
  - Improved commit message (Sagar)
  - New line in header file (Sagar)
  - Specify the message in fw_domain_reset applies to ICL+ (Sagar)

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180316121456.11577-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
[Mika: soothe checkpatch on commit msg]
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
2018-03-20 16:26:28 +02:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
a89a70a8b5 drm/i915/icl: Gen11 forcewake support
The main difference with previous GENs is that starting from Gen11
each VCS and VECS engine has its own power well, which only exist
if the related engine exists in the HW.
The fallback forcewake request workaround is only needed on gen9
according to the HSDES WA entry (1604254524), so we can go back to using
the simpler fw_domains_get/put functions.

BSpec: 18331

v2: fix fwtable, use array to test shadow tables, create new
    accessors to avoid check on every access (Tvrtko)
v3 (from Paulo): Rebase.
v4:
  - Range 09400-097FF should be FORCEWAKE_ALL (Daniele)
  - Use the BIT macro for forcewake domains (Daniele)
  - Add a comment about the range ordering (Oscar)
  - Updated commit message (Oscar)
v5: Rebased
v6: Use I915_MAX_VCS/VECS (Michal)
v7: translate FORCEWAKE_ALL to available domains
v8: rebase, add clarification on fallback ack in commit message.
v9: fix rebase issue, change check in fw_domains_init from IS_GEN11
    to GEN >= 11
v10: Generate is_genX_shadowed with a macro (Daniele)
     Include gen11_fw_ranges in the selftest (Michel)
v11: Simplify FORCEWAKE_ALL, new line between NEEDS_FORCEWAKEs (Tvrtko)

Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180302161501.28594-6-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
2018-03-07 15:07:45 +02:00