Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Andi Kleen
ab2e0b46cb [PATCH] Fix some broken white space in ia32_signal.c
No functional changes
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
2006-09-26 10:52:41 +02:00
Andi Kleen
536e3ee4fe [PATCH] Initialize argument registers for 32bit signal handlers.
In case the user space was compiled with -mregparm=3
Following i386. Pointed out by Albert Cahalan

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
2006-09-26 10:52:41 +02:00
Andi Kleen
dd54a11004 [PATCH] Remove all traces of signal number conversion
This was old code that was needed for iBCS and x86-64 never supported that.

Pointed out by Albert Cahalan
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
2006-09-26 10:52:41 +02:00
Andi Kleen
1d001df19d [PATCH] Add TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK
We need TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK in order to support ppoll() and pselect()
system calls. This patch originally came from Andi, and was based
heavily on David Howells' implementation of same on i386. I fixed a typo
which was causing do_signal() to use the wrong signal mask.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
2006-09-26 10:52:26 +02:00
Andi Kleen
5c0f80fab3 [PATCH] x86_64: Remove long obsolete CVS
Early development of x86-64 Linux was in CVS, but that hasn't been
the case for a long time now. Remove the obsolete $Id$s.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-06-26 10:48:16 -07:00
Peter Beutner
4724e3e86d [PATCH] x86_64: fix single step handling for 32bit processes
Be more careful with TF handling to fix some copy protection codes in wine

patch originally for i386 by Linus, then ported to x86_64 by Andi Kleen
see: [PATCH] x86_64: Some fixes for single step handling
commit: be61bff789

But it was never applied to the ia32 emulation code which breaks some
copy-protection schemes under wine when running on x86_64.

Signed-off-by: Peter Beutner <p.beutner@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-01-11 19:04:50 -08:00
Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer
d347f37227 [PATCH] i386: fix stack alignment for signal handlers
This fixes the setup of the alignment of the signal frame, so that all
signal handlers are run with a properly aligned stack frame.

The current code "over-aligns" the stack pointer so that the stack frame
is effectively always mis-aligned by 4 bytes.  But what we really want
is that on function entry ((sp + 4) & 15) == 0, which matches what would
happen if the stack were aligned before a "call" instruction.

Signed-off-by: Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer <markus@oberhumer.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-10-10 08:45:06 -07:00
Roland McGrath
0928d6ef7f [PATCH] x86_64: never block forced SIGSEGV
This is the x86_64 version of the signal fix I just posted for i386.

This problem was first noticed on PPC and has already been fixed there.
But the exact same issue applies to other platforms in the same way.  The
signal blocking for sa_mask and the handled signal takes place after the
handler setup.  When the stack is bogus, the handler setup forces a
SIGSEGV.  But then this will be blocked, and returning to user mode will
fault again and iterate.  This patch fixes the problem by checking whether
signal handler setup failed, and not doing the signal-blocking if so.  This
copies what was done in the ppc code.  I think all architectures' signal
handler setup code follows this pattern and needs the change.

Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-23 09:45:13 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00