Patch series "Replace all open encodings for NUMA_NO_NODE", v3.
All these places for replacement were found by running the following
grep patterns on the entire kernel code. Please let me know if this
might have missed some instances. This might also have replaced some
false positives. I will appreciate suggestions, inputs and review.
1. git grep "nid == -1"
2. git grep "node == -1"
3. git grep "nid = -1"
4. git grep "node = -1"
This patch (of 2):
At present there are multiple places where invalid node number is
encoded as -1. Even though implicitly understood it is always better to
have macros in there. Replace these open encodings for an invalid node
number with the global macro NUMA_NO_NODE. This helps remove NUMA
related assumptions like 'invalid node' from various places redirecting
them to a common definition.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1545127933-10711-2-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> [ixgbe]
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> [mtip32xx]
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> [dmaengine.c]
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> [powerpc]
Acked-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> [drivers/infiniband]
Cc: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.
How this work was done:
Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).
All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.
- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.
For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139
and resulted in the first patch in this series.
If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930
and resulted in the second patch in this series.
- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1
and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).
- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.
In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.
Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.
In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.
Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct
This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.
These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Semicolons are not necessary after switch/while/for/if braces
so remove them.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
of_device is just a #define alias to platform_device. This patch
replaces all references to it with platform_device.
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The following structure elements duplicate the information in
'struct device.of_node' and so are being eliminated. This patch
makes all readers of these elements use device.of_node instead.
(struct of_device *)->node
(struct dev_archdata *)->prom_node (sparc)
(struct dev_archdata *)->of_node (powerpc & microblaze)
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
After conversion to use unsigned long long for u64
I saw following warnings:
CC arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.o
arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.c: In function `psycho_check_stc_error':
arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.c:104: warning: long long unsigned int format, long unsigned int arg (arg 4)
arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.c:104: warning: long long unsigned int format, long unsigned int arg (arg 5)
arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.c:114: warning: long long unsigned int format, long unsigned int arg (arg 4)
arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.c:114: warning: long long unsigned int format, long unsigned int arg (arg 5)
arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.c:114: warning: long long unsigned int format, long unsigned int arg (arg 6)
arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.c:114: warning: long long unsigned int format, long unsigned int arg (arg 7)
arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.c: In function `psycho_dump_iommu_tags_and_data':
arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.c:187: warning: long long unsigned int format, long unsigned int arg (arg 8)
arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.c:193: warning: long long unsigned int format, long unsigned int arg (arg 6)
arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.c: In function `psycho_pcierr_intr':
arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.c:333: warning: long long unsigned int format, long unsigned int arg (arg 3)
arch/sparc/kernel/psycho_common.c:333: warning: long long unsigned int format, long unsigned int arg (arg 4)
This is due to different integer promotion in my 32 bit hosted gcc.
The fix is to force a few constants to ULL.
The following stands out from the rest:
+#define PSYCHO_IOMMU_TAG_VPAGE 0x7ffffULL
+#define PSYCHO_IOMMU_DATA_PPAGE 0xfffffffULL
They were needed otherwise the expression:
(data_val & PSYCHO_IOMMU_DATA_PPAGE) << IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT)
were promoted to a unsigned long and not a unsigned long long as expected.
I tried the alternative solution and made IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT an ULL but that did not help.
The only way gcc would make this expression an unsigned long long was to
define PSYCHO_IOMMU_DATA_PPAGE as ULL. The alternative to add a cast was
not considered a valid solution.
We had this issue in two places and this were the only places the above
two constants are used.
A small coding style diff sneaked in too.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Andrew Morton wrote:
People keep on doing
printk("%llu", some_u64);
testing it only on x86_64 and this generates a warning storm on
powerpc, sparc64, etc. Because they use `long', not `long long'.
Quite a few 64-bit architectures are using `long' for their
s64/u64 types. We should convert them all to `long long'.
Update types.h so we use unsigned long long for u64 and
fix all warnings in sparc64 code.
Tested with an allnoconfig, defconfig and allmodconfig builds.
This patch introduces additional warnings in several drivers.
These will be dealt with in separate patches.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
o Move all files from sparc64/kernel/ to sparc/kernel
- rename as appropriate
o Update sparc/Makefile to the changes
o Update sparc/kernel/Makefile to include the sparc64 files
NOTE: This commit changes link order on sparc64!
Link order had to change for either of sparc32 and sparc64.
And assuming sparc64 see more testing than sparc32 change link
order on sparc64 where issues will be caught faster.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
