davidlt/kernel-ark
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

tracing: Expose CPU physical addresses (resource values) for PCI devices

Browse Source 
Previously, mmio_print_pcidev() put "user" addresses in the trace buffer.
On most architectures, these are the same as CPU physical addresses, but on
microblaze, mips, powerpc, and sparc, they may be something else, typically
a raw BAR value (a bus address as opposed to a CPU address).

Always expose the CPU physical address to avoid this arch-dependent
behavior.

This change should have no user-visible effect because this file currently
depends on CONFIG_HAVE_MMIOTRACE_SUPPORT, which is only defined for x86,
and pci_resource_to_user() is a no-op on x86.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160511190657.5898.4248.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
This commit is contained in:
Bjorn Helgaas 2016-05-11 14:06:57 -05:00 committed by Steven Rostedt
parent e947841c0d
commit 9a51933e36
1 changed files with 3 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
kernel/trace/trace_mmiotrace.c
View File

@ -68,19 +68,15 @@ static void mmio_print_pcidev(struct trace_seq *s, const struct pci_dev *dev)
trace_seq_printf(s, "PCIDEV %02x%02x %04x%04x %x",
dev->bus->number, dev->devfn,
dev->vendor, dev->device, dev->irq);
/*
* XXX: is pci_resource_to_user() appropriate, since we are
* supposed to interpret the __ioremap() phys_addr argument based on
* these printed values?
*/
for (i = 0; i < 7; i++) {
pci_resource_to_user(dev, i, &dev->resource[i], &start, &end);
start = dev->resource[i].start;
trace_seq_printf(s, " %llx",
(unsigned long long)(start |
(dev->resource[i].flags & PCI_REGION_FLAG_MASK)));
}
for (i = 0; i < 7; i++) {
pci_resource_to_user(dev, i, &dev->resource[i], &start, &end);
start = dev->resource[i].start;
end = dev->resource[i].end;
trace_seq_printf(s, " %llx",
dev->resource[i].start < dev->resource[i].end ?
(unsigned long long)(end - start) + 1 : 0);