fedora-repos-anaconda needs to be pulled in via lorax, not spin-kickstarts

also adjust the comment on @anaconda-tools (which handily explains exactly
this issue, but which we clearly forgot to read...) to mention lorax as
another way stuff gets pulled into the anaconda runtime environment. We
really need to clear up what should be a dep of anaconda and what should be
included in lorax.
This commit is contained in:
Adam Williamson 2014-09-12 10:59:43 -07:00
parent 5138ac8739
commit 91f358fd7d
2 changed files with 2 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
the DVD package payload and the live images, but not in the runtime
anaconda environment. If a package is needed in anaconda's runtime
environment it should be listed as a dependency of the anaconda
package, not added to this group. See
package or pulled in via lorax, not added to this group. See
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5195 .
-->
<group>
@ -68,7 +68,6 @@
<packagereq>efibootmgr</packagereq>
<packagereq>extlinux-bootloader</packagereq>
<packagereq>fcoe-utils</packagereq>
<packagereq>fedora-repos-anaconda</packagereq>
<packagereq>firewalld</packagereq>
<packagereq>gfs2-utils</packagereq>
<packagereq>grub2</packagereq>

View File

@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
the DVD package payload and the live images, but not in the runtime
anaconda environment. If a package is needed in anaconda's runtime
environment it should be listed as a dependency of the anaconda
package, not added to this group. See
package or pulled in via lorax, not added to this group. See
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5195 .
-->
<group>
@ -68,7 +68,6 @@
<packagereq>efibootmgr</packagereq>
<packagereq>extlinux-bootloader</packagereq>
<packagereq>fcoe-utils</packagereq>
<packagereq>fedora-repos-anaconda</packagereq>
<packagereq>firewalld</packagereq>
<packagereq>gfs2-utils</packagereq>
<packagereq>grub2</packagereq>